PONARS Eurasia
  • About Us
    • Contact Us!
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Our Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Our Ukraine Experts
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • PONARS Eurasia’s Newest eBooks
    • Submissions
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Task Forces
    • Ukraine
      • PONARS Ukraine Task Force: Incontrovertible Truths
    • Amplifying Voices of Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia (AVECCA)
    • Russia in a Changing Climate
  • Podcasts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

[email protected]
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About Us
    • Contact Us!
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Our Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Our Ukraine Experts
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • PONARS Eurasia’s Newest eBooks
    • Submissions
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Task Forces
    • Ukraine
      • PONARS Ukraine Task Force: Incontrovertible Truths
    • Amplifying Voices of Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia (AVECCA)
    • Russia in a Changing Climate
  • Podcasts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • A Deal with the Devil: Lukashenko Navigates Domestic and External Vulnerabilities in Managing Relations with Russia

    View
  • Peacemaking Russian Style: Negotiations as the Continuation of War by Other Means

    View
  • ‘DIY Warfare’: How Russia Crowdsources the Battlefield in Ukraine

    View
  • Russia’s Loss of Reputation and Status in the Middle East: Potential Consequences for Putin at Home and Abroad

    View
  • Where Concessions Meet Resolve: How Ukrainian Society Sees U.S. Efforts to End Russia’s War

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Security Implications of North Korea’s Support for Russia’s War on Ukraine

  • December 15, 2025
  • Elizabeth Wishnick

Image credit/license

PONARS EURASIA POLICY MEMO NO. 952 (PDF)

One of the unexpected developments in Russia’s full-scale war on Ukraine has been North Korea’s involvement, marking the first time North Korean forces have fought overseas. North Korean support seems likely to continue, as North Korea’s leader Kim Jong-un effusively told Russian President Vladimir Putin in Beijing on September 3, 2025: “If there is something we can do to help Russia, we will definitely do it. We will consider it a brotherly duty and will do everything to help Russia.” North Korea’s involvement in Ukraine will create new impediments to ending the war and have a far-reaching impact on European and Asian security.

Support for the Russian War Effort

North Korea first revealed itself as a supporter of Russia’s war in July 2022, when it joined Syria, along with Russia itself, in recognizing the Russian annexation of the occupied Ukrainian regions of Donetsk and Luhansk. After former Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu met with North Korean defense officials in July 2023, North Korea began supplying large amounts of ammunition to Russia. According to analysis by the Open Source Center and Reuters, North Korea may have transferred as much as 5.8 million munitions (including 122-millimeter and 152-millimeter artillery shells, as well as 122- millimeter rockets) between August 2023 and April 2025. The scale and timing of these deliveries enabled Russia to sustain its advances and led to increased casualties for Ukraine, a RUSI study concluded.

In September 2023, Putin rolled out the red carpet for Kim and gave him a tour of Russia’s Vostochny Cosmodrome and a fighter jet plant, leading to speculation about North Korea’s wish list in exchange for its “unconditional support” for Moscow in Ukraine. In June 2024, Russia and North Korea concluded the DPRK-Russia Treaty on Comprehensive Strategic Partnership, which included a mutual defense clause. This paved the way for North Korea to send approximately 15,000 troops to Kursk Region, where they were used to foil Ukraine’s strategy of drawing down Russian troops fighting on Ukrainian territory and providing leverage in any potential land swap.

Following meetings between Russia and North Korea in June 2025, Pyongyang will send 5,000 military construction workers to Kursk Region, plus 1,000 combat engineers for demining operations. According to Ukraine’s Main Directorate of Intelligence (HUR) 12,000 North Koreans will go to Tatarstan by the year-end to work in drone manufacturing. Another 10,000 workers have already been sent to the Russian Far East to fill labor shortages, with potentially another 40,000 to be dispatched. United Nations sanctions on North Korea—which Russia was instrumental in ending—previously prohibited these labor contracts. North Koreans formerly worked in construction, the timber industry, and agriculture in the Russian Far East, and it remains to be seen whether the new contracts will remain in these areas, or these workers will go to support the Russian defense sector.

From Pyongyang’s perspective, involvement in the war has allowed North Korean troops to acquire valuable combat experience with modern weapons, not to mention the hard currency—not easily obtainable (at least legally) elsewhere—the war brings in. According to South Korea’s National Intelligence Service, each North Korean solider is paid $2,000 monthly, meaning that North Korea may be earning $30 million a month from these outsourced soldiers. Salaries for the North Korean laborers sent to Russia are sent directly to North Korea, the BBC has reported. The workers are paid only after they return—and even then only receive $100-200 of their pay, the rest kept by the North Korean state as “loyalty fees.”

In exchange for the North Korean contingent, Russia also is believed to be delivering more oil and food, as well as military technology, potentially including missile and submarine technology and fighter aircraft. Russian drone technology transfers and training have the potential to transform North Korean drone capabilities. According to Kyrylo Budanov, chief of the HUR, Russia is helping North Korea to manufacture long-range Shahed drones, which could have a major impact on the balance of power on the Korean Peninsula.

North Korea’s involvement in Ukraine has helped Russia to maintain, if not extend, its positions in Ukraine. By contributing to the available pool of recruits, albeit marginally, it has enabled Russia to reduce the cost of continuing the war. (Lucrative signing bonuses have bolstered recruitment within Russia, however, although budget constraints may translate into a decline in volunteers going forward.) Indeed, in Kursk Region, the well-timed infusion of North Korean troops made a difference. Ukrainian media have reported that some North Korean forces in Kursk are serving as drone operators and supporting Russian operations in Ukraine’s Sumy Region. As the sides try to reach an agreement to end the war, the role of North Korean forces in the conflict may create an additional impediment.

Impact on European Security

North Korean involvement in Ukraine has widened the war and brought the Korean conflict to Europe’s doorstep. For South Korea, the deepening Russia-North Korea military relationship is a source of new security concerns around North Korean military modernization and improved warfighting skills—with Russian support and technology. After North Korea and Russia signed the June 2024 strategic partnership agreement, the South Korean government indicated it would reconsider the type of military assistance that would be provided to Ukraine and introduced sanctions on several entities involved in arms transfers between Russia and North Korea.  

South Korean public opinion is largely opposed to providing lethal aid to Ukraine, with 65.5 percent opposed versus 29.1 percent in favor, according to October 2024 polling. Nevertheless, South Korea has played a key role in resupplying the United States with artillery shells that were eventually provided to Ukraine. Although South Korean law prohibits sending lethal aid to war zones, South Korea outpaced all European countries with its indirect provision of 155-millimeter artillery shells in 2023. During the first two years of the war, South Korea  provided 500,000 rounds of artillery shells to the United States to replace shells sent to Ukraine. Seoul also provided equipment to Ukraine for demining and humanitarian purposes.

Since ties with Russia began to grow closer, North Korea has displayed little interest in dialogue with the South, notwithstanding some initial overtures by newly elected South Korean President Lee Jae Myung to reduce tensions. While seeking to engage the North, the new government in Seoul also doubled humanitarian aid to Ukraine in 2025—$100 million was pledged for humanitarian aid and reconstruction. South Korea also indicated it would be willing to accept any North Korean POWs in Ukraine that request asylum. Thus, Ukraine has effectively become a “proxy battlefield” for Seoul and Pyongyang.

The Korean dimension of Russia’s war on Ukraine gives credence to voices in NATO and East Asia that seek to enhance NATO engagement with Asian states like South Korea and Japan. Korea is one of four Indo-Pacific countries (the others being Japan, Australia, and New Zealand) to participate in NATO summits since 2022. In October 2024, South Korea participated in a NATO defense ministers’ summit for the first time and has been expanding cooperation with the alliance in several areas, such as cyber defense, technology development, and arms control and nonproliferation.

Consequences for China-Russia-North Korea relations and Asian Security

The Chinese Foreign Ministry has claimed that “China is happy to see North Korea and Russia grow their ties and play a constructive role for the peace and stability of this region.” Meanwhile, China has refused to comment on North Korean forces fighting for Russia in Ukraine, even though this violated the oft-stated Chinese position against expanding the war. Nonetheless, as Russia-North Korea relations improved in 2024, Beijing’s ties to Pyongyang appeared to worsen. The specific reason is not fully clear, but China’s continued support for the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula certainly contributed. For China, a nuclear North Korea lends weight to political forces in South Korea and Japan urging for a stronger military—including a minority in support of an independent nuclear capability—and to voices calling for a role for NATO in Asia. When Putin met with Kim in Pyongyang in 2024, Chinese officials were in Seoul meeting with their South Korean and Japanese counterparts. Their joint statement included language opposing the nuclearization of the Korean Peninsula, drawing a rebuke from Pyongyang.

After Chinese Premier Li Qiang visited North Korea on October 9–11, 2025, to celebrate the 80th anniversary of North Korea’s ruling party, relations between Beijing and Pyongyang appeared to have warmed again. However, North Korean Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs Pak Myong Ho denounced the discussion by Chinese President by Xi Jinping and South Korean President Lee Jae Myung of denuclearizing the Korean Peninsula as a “pipe dream.” With more than 90 percent of North Korea’s trade with China, North Korea’s strategic partnership with Russia has provided greater leverage for Pyongyang in dealing with Beijing. Thus, despite North Korea’s apparent economic dependence on China, it was Xi Jinping who worked hard to reset relations during Kim’s September 2025 visit to Beijing for ceremonies commemorating the end of World War II. In contrast to the enthusiasm expressed in the meeting between Putin and Kim, the readout of the meeting between Xi and Kim put the formulaic nature of the interaction on display. Nevertheless, Xi treated Kim as an honored guest, holding a special, small bilateral reception marking the first time in six years that the two leaders had met. 

Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula used to be a position that Russia and China shared, yet they both dropped this demand in 2025. China may be calculating that the risks of tensions rising on the Korean Peninsula are lower with South Korea’s newly elected Lee—known for his support for engagement with the North. Even before Kim and Putin finalized their military alliance, in December 2023 the North Korean leader likened North-South relations to interactions between two hostile states. Russia’s support for North Korea, including its military, may provide Kim with the tools to act on this assessment. That is a situation China seeks to avoid—due to its immediate consequences for China’s northeast provinces that border North Korea, but also because a reckless act by Pyongyang would require Beijing to take a stand. Xi has sought to balance China’s strong economic ties with South Korea with China’s long-time relationship with North Korea—an alliance, on paper at least. China’s relationship with North Korea has been more inscrutable of late, however, and there has been little commentary about it in the Chinese media since the September 2025 Xi-Kim summit (except for the official readout).

North Korea’s Role in Russia’s War on Ukraine Deepens Uncertainties

Now that the initial contingent of North Korean forces has largely fulfilled their mission in Kursk Region, it remains to be seen how Russia will employ any additional forces from North Korea in the war. The Russia-North Korea strategic partnership agreement invokes mutual defense in the event of an invasion of either state, presumably referring to their own sovereign territory. Even if North Korean troops are not sent to the front lines, they appear to have been used already as drone operators, targeting Ukrainian territory from Russia, and could work in reconstruction in the occupied regions of Ukraine. It is likely that any ceasefire or peace settlement would need to address the role and location of North Korean nationals on occupied Ukrainian land.

Another key concern is the impact of Russia’s partnership on North Korea’s behavior on the Korean Peninsula. Thus far Kim has shown diminished interest in engaging with South Korea, despite some overtures by Lee. In the future, however, Kim may feel emboldened to use some of the new military hardware that Russia is providing—or at least less interested in bilateral or multilateral negotiations involving South Korea.

In the long term, once the war in Ukraine ends—and especially in the event of sanctions on Russia being lifted—North Korea’s leverage may decline, as Russia seeks to reinvigorate ties with South Korea. This already happened once, in the 1990s, when Russia sacrificed ties with Pyongyang, allowing the 1961 USSR-DPRK Treaty of Friendship, Cooperation and Mutual Assistance to lapse in the interest of improved relations with Seoul. Nonetheless, Putin may see continued value in maintaining a long-term alliance with North Korea as a means of bolstering Russian security in Northeast Asia.

Prior to 2022, relations between Moscow and Seoul had been a priority for Putin, due to his interest in grandiose potential gas and transportation infrastructure projects connecting the Korean Peninsula to the Russian Far East, as well as South Korean participation in the development of the Russian Arctic. After the full-scale invasion of Ukraine, however, South Korea has complied with UN sanctions on Russia and imposed additional sanctions on entities supporting North Korea-Russia military ties. South Korea’s continued support for such sanctions and its role in backstopping ammunition supplies to Ukraine will be important moving forward. With a new, progressive president in Seoul and a new, hard-line prime minister in Tokyo, Sanae Takaichi, it is unclear how the leaders of South Korea and Japan (which also imposed its own sanctions on entities involved with Russia-North Korea military ties) will opt to hold Moscow and Pyongyang accountable for their joint military actions in Ukraine. In this context, maintaining strong U.S.-South Korea-Japan and EU-South Korea-Japan ties, as well as engagement between NATO and South Korea and Japan, will be significant in increasing the costs to Russia and China of North Korean military support for Russia’s war on Ukraine.

PONARS EURASIA POLICY MEMO NO. 952 (PDF)

Image credit/license

Previous Article
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

War on Screens: The Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine in Russian State Media

  • December 15, 2025
  • Anton Shirikov
View
Next Article
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Hammering In the Last Nail: Georgian Dream Targets Universities

  • December 22, 2025
  • Stephen F. Jones
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

A Deal with the Devil: Lukashenko Navigates Domestic and External Vulnerabilities in Managing Relations with Russia

  • Ryhor Nizhnikau and Arkady Moshes
  • February 9, 2026
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Peacemaking Russian Style: Negotiations as the Continuation of War by Other Means

  • Pavel Baev
  • January 26, 2026
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

‘DIY Warfare’: How Russia Crowdsources the Battlefield in Ukraine

  • Mariya Omelicheva
  • January 26, 2026
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russia’s Loss of Reputation and Status in the Middle East: Potential Consequences for Putin at Home and Abroad

  • Kimberly Marten
  • January 12, 2026
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Where Concessions Meet Resolve: How Ukrainian Society Sees U.S. Efforts to End Russia’s War

  • Mikhail Alexseev and Serhii Dembitskyi
  • December 22, 2025
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Hammering In the Last Nail: Georgian Dream Targets Universities

  • Stephen F. Jones
  • December 22, 2025
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

War on Screens: The Full-Scale Invasion of Ukraine in Russian State Media

  • Anton Shirikov
  • December 15, 2025
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Voice of America, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, and U.S. Strategic Interests in Central Asia

  • Eric McGlinchey
  • December 15, 2025
PONARS Eurasia
  • About Us
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.