PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
Contacts
Address 1957 E St NW, Washington, DC 20052 adminponars@gwu.edu 202.994.5915
NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Preparing for the Parliamentary Elections of 2021: Russian Politics and Society (Gel’man, Lankina, Semenov, Smyth, and more)

    View
  • Russians supported Putin’s moves in Crimea in 2014. Here’s what’s different in 2021

    View
  • Putin’s Rules of the Game: The Pitfalls of Russia’s New Constitution

    View
  • In the Caucasus, There Is a Peace Agreement but Not Peace

    View
  • Russia’s Niche Soft Power: Sources, Targets and Channels of Influence

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • Music and Politics in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2021] April 12, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Gorbachev about the dynamic music scene in contemporary Russia, and how free Russian musicians are to make political statements.
  • How is the Russian Government Coping with Rising Food Prices? [Lipman Series 2021] March 15, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Anton Tabakh about rising food prices in Russia, and what they might mean for Russia's current and future stability.
  • The Communist Party of the Russian Federation: More Than Just Systemic Opposition? [Lipman Series 2021] March 5, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Felix Light and Nikolay Petrov about the contemporary Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including the divisions between its leadership and membership, its attitude toward Alexei Navalny, and why it might be more than just "systemic" opposition after all.
  • Internet Resources: Civic Communication and State Surveillance [Lipman Series 2021] February 16, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Andrei Soldatov and Tanya Lokot about the role of the internet in contemporary Russian politics, including both as a tool of the Russian opposition and as an instrument of the increasingly repressive Russian regime.
  • The Rise of Alexei Navalny's Political Stature and Mass Protest in Russia [Lipman Series 2021] February 1, 2021
    In the first PONARS Eurasia Podcast of 2021, Maria Lipman chats with Greg Yudin about the current protests taking place in Russia, and what Alexei Navalny's growing popular support means for the Putin regime.
  • Russian Social Policy in the COVID-19 Era [Lipman Series 2020] December 21, 2020
    In 2020’s final episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sarah Wilson Sokhey and Ella Paneyakh to discuss Russian social policy in the COVID-19 era, and public perception of Russia’s overall pandemic response.
  • Conscious Parenting Practices in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2020] December 10, 2020
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Julia Yuzbasheva and Maria Danilova to learn more about the proliferation of "conscious parenting" practices in contemporary Russian society.
  • The Transformation of Belarussian Society [Lipman Series 2020] November 11, 2020
    In this episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Masha Lipman chats with Grigory Ioffe about the long-term and short-term factors that led up to the current protests in Belarus, and the ongoing transformation of Belarussian society.
  • Russian Lawmakers Adjust National Legislation to the Revised Constitutional Framework [Lipman Series 2020] October 26, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about ongoing changes to Russia’s national legislation based on the recently revised constitutional framework, and what these changes portend for the 2021 Duma election.
  • Russia's Regional Elections [Lipman Series 2020] September 25, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Graeme Robertson and Konstantin Gaaze about Russia’s September 13 regional elections and whether or not the Kremlin should be worried about upcoming Duma elections.
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Azerbaijan Through the Prism of BRI: China’s Mounting Interests and Influence in the Region

  • October 28, 2019
  • Anar Valiyev

(PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo) With the diminishing engagement of the United States in the South Caucasus[1] and the weak position of the EU as it deals with Brexit,[2] other world powers and major centers of gravity have begun to fill the vacuum. While traditional powers such as Russia use hard power to stay in the region, others have been exploring alternative ways to strengthen their local hand. China is one of the emerging powers that has been slowly increasing its influence in the region and is now beginning to play an important role.

China never reached the same level of intensity and cooperation with the region as it had with traditional partners such as the EU, the United States, Russia, or Southeast Asian states. Historically, relations between China and Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia were positive, but none of the countries considered the partnerships to be longstanding or strategic. Geographical distance and the absence of massive Chinese investments meant that there was little to drive the relationship forward. However, China’s swelling interest in hydrocarbon resources, as well as the potential for transportation routes through Azerbaijan and Georgia to expand its trade (and influence), has led it to consistently penetrate the region with its huge economic resources. While other partners such as the United States and the EU have had ups and downs in relations with the South Caucasus, Chinese policy could be described perhaps best through the famous Abraham Lincoln quote: “I walk slowly, but I never walk backward.” For Azerbaijan, China today is the new superpower that can invest much-needed funds into infrastructure projects and can counterbalance the growing influence of Russia.

Multivalent Relations Calmly Commence

Diplomatic relations between the two countries was established back in 1992 and cooperation between them positively developed henceforth. China always supported and recognized the territorial integrity of Azerbaijan in relation to the Karabakh conflict. Such unconditional support to Azerbaijan comes from Beijing’s own stance in repudiating any secessionism. Having its own problem with breakaway-territory Taiwan, China has unanimously supported the Azerbaijan government in UN voting related to territorial integrity, and it has received reciprocal attitudes from Baku. Beijing was involved in only a few oil projects in Azerbaijan, mostly for representational purposes rather than economic benefits; it wanted a presence without massive immersion. Relations were good but neither side considered the other to be an essential partner.

China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) project introduced in 2013 (and known until 2016 as One Belt, One Road) gave impetus to enhancing relations among the states along the new Silk Road. Azerbaijan reacted positively when China announced this ambitious program because Baku urgently needed players that could fill the vacuums left by an increasingly disengaged West. It hoped that land routes and high-speed rail links connecting East Asia and Europe would bring in Chinese funds and allow Azerbaijan to catch a share of the transportation benefits.

Starting in 2015, Beijing and Baku began to intensify their political relations. In December 2015, President Ilham Aliyev visited China, met with the country’s political establishment, and called for Chinese companies to invest in Azerbaijan. In 2016, the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, which was established by Chinese initiative, approved a loan of $600 million for the construction of a portion of the Trans Anatolian Natural Gas Pipeline Project (TANAP) that transports natural gas from fields in Azerbaijan through Turkey and onto markets in Southern Europe.

In April 2019, Aliyev went on a working visit to China to attend the second BRI international forum and met with the Chinese leader. A week later, the defense minister of Azerbaijan paid an official visit to China and the sides discussed further military cooperation, particularly Azerbaijan’s purchase of Chinese military equipment. The visit concluded with a document signed on mutual military aid and the purchase of Chinese arms.

Azerbaijan has bought Chinese arms before, including the Qasirga Т-300, a tactical weapon system used to support artillery units that releases indirect/blind shots against targets in all weather conditions. This weapon is actually produced in Turkey by Chinese license. Even the Polonez multiple launch rocket system that was purchased by Azerbaijan from Belarus was designed in cooperation with China. China has offered to sell Azerbaijan its main battle tank (the Type 99A2), a lightweight multirole fighter aircraft (the Chengdu J10), and the armored personnel carrier VP 10. Because Azerbaijan and Armenia are both under an OSCE arms embargo due to the Karabakh  conflict, Baku has paid attention to other arms suppliers. Russian weapons do not give a competitive advantage to Azerbaijan vis-à-vis its archrival Armenia because Russia supplies the same or even superior weapons to Yerevan. At the same time, Baku eyes full-fledged cooperation with China in hopes it will help with resolving the Karabakh conflict peacefully, by, essentially, continuing to support the Azerbaijani cause at the United Nations.

Key Economic Aspects

In such a context, trade turnover between Azerbaijan and China shows positive dynamics.

During Aliyev’s visit to China, several agreements were signed. Based on these deals, for example, the China National Electric Engineering Company (CNEEC) will invest $300 million into a tire factory in Azerbaijan, an investment that promises to create 800 new jobs and boost the plant’s production potential to 3.3 million tires per year. Another multimillion dollar agreement would see investments into the agriculture sector. The signed package of agreements, in fact, increases the level of Chinese investments into Azerbaijan to the extent that the developments could be considered as a turning point in relations between the two states.

In 2018, imports from China increased by 40 percent and trade turnover reached $1.3 billion. Azerbaijan has become China’s number one trading partner in the South Caucasus compared to Armenia and Georgia. At the same time, Azerbaijan’s investments into China’s economy reached $1.7 billion, while China’s investments into Azerbaijan’s economy came close to $800 million. About 119 companies relying on Chinese capital are operating in Azerbaijan. Yet, China’s trade with the region is still far behind its trade with, for example, Kazakhstan at about $10 billion or Uzbekistan at about $6 billion (2018).

Baku’s political establishment enthusiastically greeted the Chinese BRI initiative, even though the public is largely unaware of many of the Chinese projects. Chinese investment helps to fill the funding gaps in Azerbaijan’s strategic development plan, allowing many projects to move forward that would otherwise have struggled.

In August 2015, the first container to use the BRI route travelled more than 4,000 km from China in a record six days to the newly constructed Baku International Sea Trade Port. This signaled a new era in regional transport links. It demonstrated to Chinese firms that cargo could reach Europe much faster via this BRI passage than by sea or through Russia. Both Kazakhstan and Azerbaijan pointed to these transportation aspects and developments to encourage Chinese companies to invest more in their territories. Azerbaijani authorities believe that by 2020 some 300,000–400,000 containers will be transported via the Azerbaijani route, bringing in billions of dollars in profit.

Both the Azerbaijani public and political establishment contend that China does not have a political agenda in the region due to its geographical distance. Chinese projects are therefore considered in purely economic terms. With falling oil prices and fewer cash reserves in the country, Chinese investments appear to be critical. Furthermore, China is perceived as a country that delivers and implements projects quickly. In contrast to the United States and the EU, both constrained by bureaucratic hurdles, and Russia, which puts geopolitics ahead of economics, China is considered to be a reliable and responsive partner.

Future Implications

Comparing China’s transnational connectivity program with Russian or EU integration projects, it seems clear, firstly, that China does not threaten the EU’s political stance toward the region as much as it might the Eurasian Economic Union’s (EEU’s). The Chinese initiative does not have the short-term agenda of exerting political and economic power/control over post-Soviet Eurasian states as does the EEU. In the long run, China’s program could provide tools for countries to get closer to Beijing for political and economic support. Currently, Azerbaijani-Russian relations are not burdened by any kind of negative issues or events, but despite Moscow’s push for Azerbaijan to join the EEU, Baku has been able to postpone that decision. 

BRI could serve to strengthen ties between Asia and Europe. For instance, while China invests in BRI, the EU could invest in and revive the Transport Corridor Europe-Caucasus-Asia (TRACECA) project. The question that may arise is: which power, the EU or China, will have the greater influence along the route? While it would be difficult for the EU to compete with Chinese influence (especially after the establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank), the South Caucasus leans toward, and on, European political influence. However, China’s involvements may very well greatly complement EU policy in the region. Chinese investments may not only help to develop other transportation routes but also help the region’s countries, especially Azerbaijan, to build up non-oil export potential. China could save money on the transportation costs of sending its products to Europe by exporting them from Azerbaijan. Europe would receive cheaper products from an Eastern Partnership country. And Azerbaijan would receive benefits such as the opening of new workplaces (employment) and new taxes, and its export potential status would improve.

Beijing’s ability to pump investment into Azerbaijan and help it stave off a potential financial crisis, with fast deliverables, makes China more attractive than various erstwhile Western investors. Still, the Chinese incursion should raise questions and prompt caution. Due to the low price of oil and the requirement for massive investment into the oil and gas sector, China’s role could become dominant, making it a critical power in the region once the oil contracts end and Western oil companies leave the country. It would force Azerbaijan to maintain a balanced policy toward China, to take into account Chinese interests as Baku manages its own strategic and national interests. Moreover, with its many lucrative industries and ports, Azerbaijan may face a “debt-trap diplomacy” issue with China whereby Beijing gives loans and expects repayment by (majority) shares or ownership of companies and industries. In recognition of this, Baku prefers to partner with China without committing to certain kinds of loans (such as “predatory loans”) that require state guarantees.

Chinese penetration into the region may also create zealous attitudes from traditional partners such as Turkey and Russia. Turkey considers the region as an area of its strategic interests, but nevertheless, it would not oppose investments from China. At the same time, even though Russia does not have friction with China, Moscow considers the South Caucasus in its sphere of influence. Baku is well aware of this situation and therefore cautiously builds relations with the “Eastern Giant” on the economic front while keeping cordial or neutral political relations with the other big powers involved in the region.

Anar Valiyev is Associate Professor at ADA University, Baku, Azerbaijan.

Note: Research work for this policy memo was funded by the UK Research and Innovation Councils (UKRI) under the Global Challenges 

[PDF]


[1] See: Anar Valiyev, “U.S. Disengagement from the South Caucasus: The Throne Is Never Vacant,“ PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 545, October 2018.

[2] See: Anar Valiyev, “Brexit and its Impact on Azerbaijan: Will East-West Integration be Harmed?,” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 461, February 2017.

Homepage image credit/license.

Memo #:
621
Series:
2
PDF:
Pepm621_Valiyev_Oct2019.pdf
Anar Valiyev
Anar Valiyev
Website | + posts
Dean and Associate Professor, School of Public and International Affairs
Affiliation

ADA University, Baku
Links

ADA University (Bio)
Expertise

Public Policy of Post-Soviet Republics, Democracy and Governance, Urban Development and Planning
  • Anar Valiyev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/anar-valiyev/
    COVID-19 Implications for Azerbaijan: Momentum Immobilized by a Perfect Storm
  • Anar Valiyev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/anar-valiyev/
    The Myth of Syrian Mercenaries in Karabakh Debunked in Eight Parts
  • Anar Valiyev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/anar-valiyev/
    A battle for transportation routes in the Russian neighborhood: Is there a place for small states?
  • Anar Valiyev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/anar-valiyev/
    Ten Years of Eastern Partnership in Azerbaijan: Time to Take Serious Steps
Related Topics
  • 2019
  • Azerbaijan
  • China
  • Oil & Gas
  • South Caucasus
  • Turkey
  • Valiyev
Previous Article
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Putin and Xi: Ice Cream Buddies and Tandem Strongmen

  • October 25, 2019
  • Elizabeth Wishnick
View
Next Article
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The White Whale Chooses Freedom: Hard Choices in Opposing Russian Dominance in the Arctic

  • October 29, 2019
  • Pavel Baev
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

This Time is Different (Again): The Political Consequences of the Economic Crisis in Russia

  • Andrei Semenov
  • April 1, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Dzerzhinsky Discord: Who Will Fill the Vacancy in Lubyanka Square?

  • Maria Lipman
  • March 19, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Political Consequences of Public Relations Miscalculations: Will Ukraine’s Anti-corruption Bureau be Terminated?

  • Ivan Gomza
  • March 12, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Belarus Protests and Russia: Lessons for “Big Brother”

  • Natalya Chernyshova
  • March 1, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Central Asian Responses to COVID-19: Regime Legitimacy and [De]Securitization of the Health Crisis

  • Mariya Omelicheva and Lawrence P. Markowitz
  • March 1, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

COVID-19 in Russia: What Russians Expected, What They Got, and What They Think About It

  • Sarah Wilson Sokhey
  • February 22, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Russian Parliament and the Pandemic: A State of Emergency, Post-constitutional Changes, Retaliatory Laws

  • Ekaterina Schulmann
  • February 16, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Pasta and Sugar, Not Navalny, Are Putin’s Main Worries

  • Evgeny Finkel, Janetta Azarieva and Yitzhak Brudny
  • February 9, 2021
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.