PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
Contacts
Address 1957 E St NW, Washington, DC 20052 adminponars@gwu.edu 202.994.5915
NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Preparing for the Parliamentary Elections of 2021: Russian Politics and Society (Gel’man, Lankina, Semenov, Smyth, and more)

    View
  • Russians supported Putin’s moves in Crimea in 2014. Here’s what’s different in 2021

    View
  • Putin’s Rules of the Game: The Pitfalls of Russia’s New Constitution

    View
  • In the Caucasus, There Is a Peace Agreement but Not Peace

    View
  • Russia’s Niche Soft Power: Sources, Targets and Channels of Influence

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • Music and Politics in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2021] April 12, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Gorbachev about the dynamic music scene in contemporary Russia, and how free Russian musicians are to make political statements.
  • How is the Russian Government Coping with Rising Food Prices? [Lipman Series 2021] March 15, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Anton Tabakh about rising food prices in Russia, and what they might mean for Russia's current and future stability.
  • The Communist Party of the Russian Federation: More Than Just Systemic Opposition? [Lipman Series 2021] March 5, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Felix Light and Nikolay Petrov about the contemporary Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including the divisions between its leadership and membership, its attitude toward Alexei Navalny, and why it might be more than just "systemic" opposition after all.
  • Internet Resources: Civic Communication and State Surveillance [Lipman Series 2021] February 16, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Andrei Soldatov and Tanya Lokot about the role of the internet in contemporary Russian politics, including both as a tool of the Russian opposition and as an instrument of the increasingly repressive Russian regime.
  • The Rise of Alexei Navalny's Political Stature and Mass Protest in Russia [Lipman Series 2021] February 1, 2021
    In the first PONARS Eurasia Podcast of 2021, Maria Lipman chats with Greg Yudin about the current protests taking place in Russia, and what Alexei Navalny's growing popular support means for the Putin regime.
  • Russian Social Policy in the COVID-19 Era [Lipman Series 2020] December 21, 2020
    In 2020’s final episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sarah Wilson Sokhey and Ella Paneyakh to discuss Russian social policy in the COVID-19 era, and public perception of Russia’s overall pandemic response.
  • Conscious Parenting Practices in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2020] December 10, 2020
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Julia Yuzbasheva and Maria Danilova to learn more about the proliferation of "conscious parenting" practices in contemporary Russian society.
  • The Transformation of Belarussian Society [Lipman Series 2020] November 11, 2020
    In this episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Masha Lipman chats with Grigory Ioffe about the long-term and short-term factors that led up to the current protests in Belarus, and the ongoing transformation of Belarussian society.
  • Russian Lawmakers Adjust National Legislation to the Revised Constitutional Framework [Lipman Series 2020] October 26, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about ongoing changes to Russia’s national legislation based on the recently revised constitutional framework, and what these changes portend for the 2021 Duma election.
  • Russia's Regional Elections [Lipman Series 2020] September 25, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Graeme Robertson and Konstantin Gaaze about Russia’s September 13 regional elections and whether or not the Kremlin should be worried about upcoming Duma elections.
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Leadership Change and Protests in Russia’s Kalmykia: Moscow’s Corruptive Meddling and Its Discontents

  • December 2, 2019
  • Edward Holland

(PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo) In late March 2019, the head of the Republic of Kalmykia, Alexei Orlov, resigned and was swiftly replaced—the same day, in fact—by Batu Khasikov, a kickboxer and former Kalmykia representative to the Federation Council, who got the requisite photo-op with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Khasikov’s position was confirmed in September 2019 elections. Later that month, Khasikov named Dmitry Trapeznikov, an ethnic Russian and former leader of the self-proclaimed separatist Donetsk People’s Republic in Ukraine, to the post of acting head of Elista, Kalmykia’s capital. This appointment sparked extensive and ongoing protests in a republic located to the north of the North Caucasus that is generally viewed as one of the most stable and quiescent in the Russian Federation.

The protests in Kalmykia reveal several important developments taking place both at the federal and regional levels. At the federal level, this is indicative of the current trend whereby the Kremlin appoints people with little political or managerial experience as regional leaders. Such appointments may backfire against the backdrop of growing political activism in Russian regions. At the regional level, a spark of protest often leads to the voicing of other grievances; in Kalmykia, these issues include a low quality of life, lack of opportunities and jobs, widespread corruption, and decaying infrastructure, among other issues. United by their grievances and “patriotism for their city,” a large turnout of protestors of different ages, genders, social backgrounds, and political orientations suddenly became politically active. This rise of protests also demonstrates the power vacuum in Kalmykia, where political elites have lost trust as people increasingly and openly acknowledge their corruption.

A Leadership Change Like Any Other

Orlov, similar to other regional leaders in Russia’s south, built his career beyond the republic he was chosen to lead. For a decade and a half, he was the permanent representative of Kalmykia to the Russian president in Moscow, and served briefly as an aide to Kalmykia’s prime minister in 2003. His political rise depended on the patronage of his predecessor as Kalmykia’s leader, Kirsan Ilyumzhinov (in power from 1993 to 2010). With his nomination and appointment in the fall of 2010 during the Medvedev interregnum, Orlov was tasked with addressing social problems and rampant corruption associated with the tenure of his predecessor, Ilyumzhinov.

Orlov’s leadership, however, was characterized by distrust on the part of the population from the beginning. In 2011, a group of Kalmyk parents appealed to U.S. President Barack Obama about poor conditions at a children’s hospital in Elista. The next year, Orlov’s attempts at purging a set of bureaucrats with ties to Ilyumzhinov led to fierce blowback against his leadership in the local media, which Ilyumzhinov still controlled; a 2013 internet survey asking respondents who they would support for Kalmykia’s leader if elections were held the next day put Orlov’s support at just over 10 percent. 

By tapping into vast administrative resources, Orlov recovered by the next year and was elected to the position of Head of Republic with 83 percent of the vote in September 2014. This election was one of 32 in Russia’s regions held between 2013 and 2015 where the governor resigned prematurely, was appointed as acting head of the region, and subsequently ran for reelection. This past spring, Orlov instead was one of a set of regional leaders dismissed by Putin and replaced by another candidate. The list also includes Chelyabinsk’s governor Boris Dubrovsky, who was implicated in a corruption scandal involving road construction in that region.

Orlov faced similar headwinds. In March of this year, he was implicated in a corruption scandal associated with the construction of housing for orphans, with the contractor overcharging by roughly 10 million rubles for work on three projects in total. There was also overhang from a long-developing scandal; in July 2017, the republic’s First Deputy Prime Minister Peter Lantsanov was accused of siphoning off state subsidies—an estimated 40 million rubles in total—intended for agricultural producers to a holding account, from which the monies were subsequently stolen. In August 2019, the high court of Kalmykia sentenced the former minister of agriculture—the position that Lantsanov held at the time of the fraud—to seven years in prison for his role in the 2011 scheme.

During Lantsanov’s trial, former chief of staff to Ilyumzhinov from 1994 to 2009 Igor Shalkhakov testified that Orlov himself knew of the theft and appropriated 15 million rubles for his personal use and to help pay costs associated with the holding of the March 2012 Russian presidential election. From 2014 to 2016, Shalkhakov was head of Orlov’s administration, after which he resigned, having fallen out with Orlov. Despite ongoing criminal investigations into corruption scandals in the republic’s government that have cost Kalmykia an estimated 500 million rubles, Putin thanked Orlov for his work and awarded him the Order of Friendship for his service to the country two months after his resignation. Orlov was subsequently nominated by Khasikov as a candidate to be senator from Kalmykia to the Federation Council, a choice which surprised people in Kalmykia but which was rumored to have been influenced by the Kremlin.

September Elections, October Protests

From March until September, Khasikov served as acting head of the republic. Prior to this appointment, Khasikov worked as an advisor to the director of a federal agency Rosmolodezh (Russian Youth) and was a deputy to the Khural, Kalmykia’s parliament. He also co-founded Fight Nights Global, a martial arts tournament. He fought his last professional fight in 2014 while serving as a senator from Kalmykia to the Federation Council. He purportedly spent more time in the gym than at the Council, raising the eyebrows of his fellow representatives. Khasikov’s appointment was similarly received in Kalmykia, where many consider him an outsider who has neither managerial experience nor knowledge about the situation in the republic.

During his tenure as acting head, Khasikov tried to present himself as a man of action, in contrast to Orlov’s management style. The republic has hosted several federal-level ministers and officials this year, including Deputy Prime Minister Vitaly Mutko (formerly Minister of Sport during the Sochi Olympics), Minister of Labor and Social Affairs Maksim Topilin, and Minister of Industry and Trade Denis Manturov. Further, Putin met with Khasikov in the Kremlin on July 31, which was widely publicized in the Kalmyk media; Khasikov reported on his progress and asked Putin for financial support to address key local issues, including improving the quality of drinking water and turning cattle breeding into a profitable industry. This demonstration of support for the acting head by the Kremlin was doubtless aimed at generating votes for Khasikov. His candidacy was further promoted by Sangadzhi Tarbaev—Khasikov’s spin doctor, friend, and former business partner at Fight Nights Global—who in an interview with a local TV channel called on the populace to support Khasikov by pointing out that he has the trust of Putin.

Kalmykia was one of 16 regions where governor elections were held on September 8, 2019. Khasikov easily won the vote. Though the high level of support was possibly attributable to electoral fraud (at 82.9 percent, Khasikov received the second highest vote percentage of all regional leaders elected), the results of the elections were not challenged by his opponents. Khasikov’s main challenger in the election was Natalya Manzhikova, the nominee from A Just Russia who received 8.4 percent. Namsyr Mandzhiev, a member of the Khural, was the putative nominee for the Communist Party. However, he was not registered by the republic’s electoral commission by the July 31 deadline, ostensibly because he did not pass the municipal filter, which requires a candidate to collect signatures from municipal legislators (the threshold is nine percent in Kalmykia; Mandzhiev appealed to a higher court to be included on the ballot, but was denied). 

Khasikov may not be popular among the older electorate, but he has a certain appeal to younger generations. He is an ethnic Kalmyk, young, fit, reserved, and clearly not a politician—he has looked uncomfortable when giving public speeches but is quickly learning how to speak smoothly by deploying bureaucratic jargon. In his speeches, he calls on the people of Kalmykia to unite and work harder for the prosperity of the republic. He embellishes his political message with cultural symbolism derived from the Kalmyk epic Jangar. For instance, during a public speech on Republic Day (July 5), a new holiday that he introduced, Khasikov gave the following task to the audience: “Let’s be proud of living in our republic…We live here to turn our republic into a real country of Bumba.” The audience was quick to draw a parallel between their new acting head, whose fighting name is Batu Khan, and Jangar Khan of the epic, who is the sovereign of the fabled country of Bumba. The epic Jangar is revered by many Kalmyks as a sacred historical document rather than a fabled tale; in the story, Bumba is a paradise on Earth where people are immortal and live in boundless happiness and plenty—the opposite of today’s Kalmykia.

His promising start was spoiled with the appointment of Trapeznikov as acting head (the equivalent of mayor) of Elista, a choice that has Moscow’s fingerprints all over it given the congratulatory note Trapeznikov received from Vladislav Surkov. Trapeznikov, whom Khasikov described as trained in “the best school for an anti-crisis manager,” faced initial opposition from local NGOs and some residents of Elista, who on September 27 sent a letter to the City Parliament demanding the new mayor’s resignation. The opposition grew more widespread with the first public gathering to protest against the appointment, which took place two days later at Elista’s Victory Square and was attended by about 150 people. In response, Khasikov made a video address, reminding the public about the Soviet past when specialists from all parts of the Soviet Union came to rebuild the republic following the Kalmyks’ return from deportation. Khasikov is implying that the ethnically Russian Trapeznikov is a similar sort of expert; however, he hardly has a record in Donetsk of building and harmonizing multinational communities.  

Unconvinced by Khasikov’s reasoning for the appointment, more than 300 people took to Elista’s Central Square on October 1. Trying to be non-confrontational, the organizers called the gathering “Prayers for the welfare of Elista.” However, instead of chanting prayers, people openly voiced their discontent that Khasikov could not find a suitable candidate from Kalmykia for the mayoral post. One of its organizers, the Kalmyk journalist Badma Byurchiev, was fined 20,000 rubles for organizing an “unsanctioned protest.” Several others were also tried and found guilty; their punishment included monetary fines or community service. Only three activists were exonerated by the court. At the time of writing, a dozen more activists are scheduled to be tried at the Elista City court for organizing and participating in this protest. Following an unsuccessful meeting with Khasikov later on October 5, activists called for another gathering—this time a “sanctioned” one—to be held on October 13 at Victory Square; this protest attracted between 2,500 to 4,000 people. It was the largest protest in Kalmykia since 2004, when OMON forces and the police brutally dispersed a rally against Ilyumzhinov’s continued tenure as president.

Subsequent protests were held in Elista on October 27 and November 17, which drew an estimated 3,500 and 1,500 people, respectively, according to organizers. Continued protests are due in part to new revelations about Khasikov’s mismanagement of the republic; on October 21, the republic’s government published Khasikov’s decree of September 21 to appoint Orlov as the new senator from Kalmykia to the Federation Council. Khasikov kept this important, yet unpopular, appointment secret for a month, giving the impression to many that issues of corruption are still prevalent in the republic, despite Khasikov’s assurances to the contrary. The protestors’ demands have now expanded to include the resignations of Khasikov and Orlov, in addition to Trapeznikov’s removal.

Conclusion

Determined to be heard, activists are now trying to reach as many audiences as they can by organizing online, cultivating conversations with members of the republican Khural and Elista City Parliament, as well as posting updates on the issue via social media (the movement has multiple Instagram hashtags, including #этонашгород (“This is our city”), #сертнсергцхятнхальмгуд (“Wake up, rise up, Kalmyk people”), and #трапезниковуходи (“Go away Trapeznikov”). The strategic use of the Internet, the echoes of urban activism as occurring in Moscow, and the level of popular protest in a hitherto politically passive region may have taken some in the Kremlin by surprise. With both sides determined to hold their ground, popular anger may reach a boiling point if no concessions are made. One of two outcomes seems probable at the moment: either the movement will be suppressed by force with grievances swept under the rug, or some sort of compromise will be initiated by the local authorities.

One of the poorest regions in Russia, Kalmykia is a republic where economic vulnerability, pervasive corruption, and political disempowerment have elicited increasing discontent. Moscow’s recentralization of power, the appointment of outsiders to work in the republic, and its meddling in local politics are perceived by many people as an attempt by the Kremlin to rid the republic of last vestiges of self-governance. These concerns build on an old fear in Kalmykia of losing its status as a republic and being merged into a neighboring region—a prospect that has historical precedent in the deportation of the Kalmyks and the abolishment of their autonomous republic during World War II and the merging of some ethnic regions in Russia during the 2000s. In this sense, Trapeznikov’s case serves as a thermometer that gauges the rising political temperature in Kalmykia. It also indicates that the longstanding issues of corruption and mismanagement that have persisted in the republic will continue despite the recent leadership change.

Edward C. Holland is Assistant Professor of Geography at the University of Arkansas.

[PDF]

Recommended: Edward C. Holland, “The Kremlin’s New Man in Dagestan: Corruption Supplants Security as Moscow’s Chief Concern,” PONARS Eurasia Policy Memo No. 549, November 2018.

Homepage image (credit): President Putin meets with Batu Khasikov, March 2019.

Memo #:
628
Series:
2
PDF:
Pepm628_Holland_Dec2019.pdf
Edward Holland
Website | + posts
Assistant Professor of Geography
Affiliation

University of Arkansas
Links

University of Arkansas (Bio)
Expertise

National Minorities, Religion, Political violence, Russia, Caucasus
  • Edward Holland
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/edward-holland/
    The Kremlin’s New Man in Dagestan: Corruption Supplants Security as Moscow’s Chief Concern
Related Topics
  • 2019
  • Holland
  • Kalmykia
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russia’s Economic Prospects: The Perils of a Petrostate

  • November 26, 2019
  • Peter Rutland
View
Next Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Caspian Energy Producers in the ‘New Oil Order’: Neglected by the West, Looking East 2

  • December 2, 2019
  • Farid Guliyev
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

This Time is Different (Again): The Political Consequences of the Economic Crisis in Russia

  • Andrei Semenov
  • April 1, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Dzerzhinsky Discord: Who Will Fill the Vacancy in Lubyanka Square?

  • Maria Lipman
  • March 19, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Political Consequences of Public Relations Miscalculations: Will Ukraine’s Anti-corruption Bureau be Terminated?

  • Ivan Gomza
  • March 12, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Belarus Protests and Russia: Lessons for “Big Brother”

  • Natalya Chernyshova
  • March 1, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Central Asian Responses to COVID-19: Regime Legitimacy and [De]Securitization of the Health Crisis

  • Mariya Omelicheva and Lawrence P. Markowitz
  • March 1, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

COVID-19 in Russia: What Russians Expected, What They Got, and What They Think About It

  • Sarah Wilson Sokhey
  • February 22, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

The Russian Parliament and the Pandemic: A State of Emergency, Post-constitutional Changes, Retaliatory Laws

  • Ekaterina Schulmann
  • February 16, 2021
View
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Pasta and Sugar, Not Navalny, Are Putin’s Main Worries

  • Evgeny Finkel, Janetta Azarieva and Yitzhak Brudny
  • February 9, 2021
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.