PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

#NotOnlyMay9th: “Volunteers of Victory” and the Global Outreach of Russian World War II Commemorations

  • July 2, 2019

For several years, Russia’s World War II remembrance policy has been widely discussed and challenged by some of the neighboring countries, while Moscow has reinforced the pompousness of the event at home. In May 2020, Russia’s commemorations will culminate in the 75th anniversary of Victory Day. This year, a new step was taken by increasing the international face of the commemoration, with over 100 international volunteers from around 40 nations and territories who convened in Moscow and then in Tula. As the sole invitee from the United States, I observed two new developments in the Russian war narrative and will discuss how this new Russian memory policy could potentially help improve U.S.-Russian public diplomacy.

The Tula Immortal Regiment 

New Developments: Internationalization & Expansion

Unlike the Immortal Regiments that marched in more than twenty American cities this year, the “Volunteers of Victory,” which mobilize commemorative efforts in Russia and now abroad, could not exist without Russian government patronage. The movement itself is under the control of Rosmolodezh, the federal youth agency, and its patriotic education division, Rospatriotcentr. The Presidential Grants Foundation and the Government of Tula Oblast sponsored the 74th-anniversary convention by covering the costs of t-shirts, airfare, and a flashy closing ceremony at Tula’s “Oktava” industrial cluster.

Until now, May 9th events in the United States have primarily been the initiative of local citizens with Russian backgrounds, such as Yekaterina Hill who lives in Washington, D.C. I volunteered with her in 2018, and I saw how hard she worked to prepare veterans’ portraits at her suburban home on the eve of the Immortal Regiment. I also noticed her decision to discourage portraits of Stalin, hammers and sickles, or national flags from joining the procession, a wise move to try to prevent political spats on what is seen by many Soviet veterans’ descendants as a sacred day.

The “Volunteers of Victory” are now expanding from the Russian Federation. In early June, its Moscow headquarters began selecting “international coordinators” in foreign countries to organize remembrance activities, many of whom are returning “Ambassadors of Victory” (delegates to Tula who convened from other countries).

In addition to expanding across the globe, the “Volunteers of Victory” are now extending their mission across the calendar. One of this organization’s hashtags on social media is #NotOnlyMay9th, referencing the year-round activities its “Victory Ambassadors” plan to do: interviewing Soviet veterans living abroad and uploading the videos to YouTube, caring for Red Army monuments overseas, designing interactive “quests” in attempts to teach history innovatively, and many other activities. Some of the convention’s graduates went into action on June 22 to help organize “Candle of Memory” demonstrations on the anniversary of the Nazi invasion.  

The purpose of this growing initiative is to interest young people in learning more about World War II through a kinesthetic learning process. For instance, in June 2019, a quest with the theme “1944: Children of War” took place. It proposed that children roleplay underage partisans, blowing up bridges made of matchboxes and making telephones out of strings and cups. While this initiative was eyebrow-raising for some delegates, it was a breath of fresh air for not being solely linked to the “Great Patriotic Victory” but meant to immerse the participant in the everyday lives of Soviet people throughout the war. This policy entails a breakout from May by which Immortal Regiments and the handout of St. George’s ribbons have been so far confined.

The subject of World War II remembrance is now poised to become a topic of debate throughout the year. War history has become even more of a daily occurrence—a serious concern for all those denouncing rising everyday militarism in Russia, such as the simple controversies of dressing toddlers in military uniforms to the nationalist rhetoric of “we can repeat it”—a reference to the fact that Russia is ready to be at war once again.

But maybe the initiative should discuss broader topics of warfare? Not only on the May 9 Victory Day, but it could be used as a window of opportunity for officials and private citizens in the United States and Russia who wish to use the collective history of WWII as a public diplomacy bridge.

Let’s examine two implications of the Russian memory strategy of internationalization and Expansion for U.S.-Russian Relations.

Tula Soldier’s Family Amid Volunteers

Perception of Russian Soft Power and Reactions to It

Émigré Russian oppositionists have criticized the Immortal Regiments in the United States as examples of “co-opted independent NGOs” serving the Kremlin’s interests. If Rosmolodezh and Rospatriotcentr now become involved—financially or through issuing orders to U.S.-based compatriots—criticism of Regiments will increase dramatically. Today’s real grassroots demonstration could morph into a projection of Moscow’s intents. Many immigrants from the former USSR support the idea of honoring their heroic relatives, but fewer want to do so hand-in-hand with the Russian Federation, and even less with the Kremlin.

There are also potential legal issues. In 2018, the organizer of the Immortal Regiment in Seattle, Sergey Gladysh, told Sputnik that the FBI questioned the regiment in the lead-up to the Russian Consulate’s closure there. While he was not suspected of being a foreign agent, this equation could change if the Russian government becomes more involved.  

In such a scenario, the “Volunteers of Victory” could be perceived as a vehicle for inserting Russia’s official historical narrative in more than forty foreign countries and as part of Russia’s hybrid media warfare. However, it doesn’t have to be that way.

MP Natalia Pilyus at the “Oktava” Closing Ceremony

Genuine Cultural Exchange and Public Diplomacy Bridge

The “Victory Ambassadors” reasonable interest in raising awareness of the USSR’s decisive role in crushing Nazi Germany—despite Soviet complicity during the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact and its long-term impact on, for instance, the Baltic states—is shared by respected Western historians. The “Volunteers of Victory” also deserve recognition for the number of intelligent young people that they have inspired. Even President Vladimir Putin’s political opposition abroad, like the Free Russia Foundation, recognize that Rosmolodezh and other federal youth projects can be considered stepping stones for future political leaders and aspiring elites. Why not take advantage of this platform and foster new contacts between students? Most young Russians I spoke with are fascinated by Russian clubs in American colleges such as mine at George Mason University. U.S. and Russian professors and students could link their universities through webinars, roundtable discussions, essay contests, and as visitors at official commemoration events.

Americans ought to see how an Immortal Regiment is organized in a city like Tula, where around 150,000 out of a population of less than half a million joined the march. Likewise, Russians should check out the National Memorial Day Parade in Washington, D.C., which includes a “March of Heroes”–Americans carrying portraits of (nonrelative) World War II veterans. The similarity between both events would be worth exploring, and some joint activities could be envisioned.

The Soviet contribution to winning World War II should continue to be known to U.S. citizens. Indeed, U.S. diplomats and military officers already make such acknowledgments in the annual “Spirit of the Elbe” event. On the anniversary of the Soviet-American link-up on the Elbe River in Germany, the U.S. Embassy in Moscow and the Russian Embassy in Washington hold joint ceremonies. Even in the middle of the current tensions, 2019 was no exception, although Victory Day 2010, the year when U.S. Army soldiers (including a Soviet soldier’s descendant) marched on Red Square, does not seem repeatable so far in such a context.

It would be in the interest of both the United States and Russia to develop joint activities around World War II commemorations and use the “Volunteers of Victory” and Immortal Regiment initiatives to re-establish a cultural dialogue by investing in reducing tensions and disproving of nationalist myths of Russophobia in the West.

To make the second scenario a reality, participants on both sides should agree that being grateful for the Soviet Union’s sacrifices does not mean absolving Stalin’s government of its crimes against humanity. The “Volunteers of Victory” ought to make clear that honoring Red Army veterans that fought for their families’ existence and memorializing the victims of Soviet oppression are not mutually exclusive.


Alexander Naumov is an undergraduate student at George Mason University studying international politics and Russian and Eurasian studies. The views and opinions in this article do not express those of the “Volunteers of Victory” or any other organization.

 

Secondary Author:
Alexander Naumov
Related Topics
  • Immortal Regiment
  • Russia
  • World War II
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russia’s Islamic Diplomacy

  • July 1, 2019
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
Next Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

What Happened to Soviet Security Studies?: An Essay on the State of the Field

  • July 8, 2019
  • Brian Taylor
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • January 30, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

  • Jean-François Ratelle
  • January 27, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • January 24, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • January 17, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russia’s war in Ukraine threatens students daily and forces teachers to improvise

  • Kristina Hook
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.