PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • A Rock and a Hard Place: The Russian Opposition in a Time of War | New Voices on Eurasia with Jeremy Ladd (April 11)

    View
  • The Russia Program at GW (IERES)

    View
  • The Evolving Concerns of Russians after the Invasion | New Voices on Eurasia with Sasha de Vogel (March 9)

    View
  • PONARS Eurasia Spring Policy Conference (March 3)

    View
  • Ukrainathon 2023 (Feb. 24-25)

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in post-Communist Russia (book event)

  • March 4, 2011
  • Graeme Robertson

 

 

PONARS Eurasia member Graeme Robertson presented his book, “The Politics of Protest in Hybrid Regimes: Managing Dissent in post-Communist Russia” (Cambridge University Press, December 2010), at a recent roundtable discussion at the Instititue of European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES), the George Washington University. Nadia Diuk joined Graeme as the event's discussant.

In his book, Robertson argues that we should look to protests in hybrid regimes as “windows” on the political system that expose its workings in ways that traditional studies have neglected. These protests constitute direct interactions between state and society, and the types and motives of protest can shed light on the nature of state power. In order to gain greater leverage on this issue, Robertson looks at protests in two periods in post-Communist Russia: the Yeltsin period (1996-2000) and Putin (2001-2008). Within these two periods, Robertson identifies three key points. The first relates to patterns of protests within the Yeltsin period, the second relates to how protest changed under Putin, and the third relates to the theoretical trends and aspects from this shift.

By exploiting new data sources from MVD stations throughout the Russian Federation, Robertson challenges the main conception that Russians were generally passive concerning protests in the Yeltsin era. The MVD sources document massive strikes, demonstrations, and railroad blockades throughout the Russian Federation with enormous variation in degree of mobilization and tactics used. The three main areas of high mobilization were in Vladivostok in the Far East, in the Urals, and in Smolensk. Not only did workers protest, but educators and miners were highly represented. Robertson stresses that the Russian repertoire of protest was highly strike-oriented during this period. These strikes and protests can be seen as the result of a combination of high levels of wage arrears and regional elite manipulation to gain attention and resources from Moscow.

Patterns of protest changed in the Putin era, Robertson asserts. One of the primary lessons learned from the Yeltsin era is that regional governors needed to be controlled in order to limit successfully the leverage the periphery has on the center. Putin also learned directly from the experience of the popular mobilization in Ukraine during the Orange Revolution and subsequent mobilization from St. Petersburg to Moscow. Following this political turmoil, the development of the pro-government agitation group, Nashi, accelerated. Pro-regime groups bring in reconcilable elements of civil society, while forcing others underground with tighter organization, eventually creating their own respective protest cadres.

By contrasting patterns and the nature of protests in these two regions, Robertson posits that “organization matters” and, ironically, that effective protest has arisen out of the Putin era, where tighter controls have forced better organizational control for the opposition. Organizations also matter in their relationship to the state and the top-down development of “ersatz social movements,” such as Nashi. Furthermore, the changes in protest that occurred in the Putin era have also altered the dynamic of elite competition from what it was in Yeltsin-era Russia. Robertson concludes that while the Putin era’s notoriety for repression is well-founded, democratic development still exists in the Russian Federation. NGOs now have tighter organization and better capabilities than they had in the Yeltsin era. While he warns against expecting broad-stroke democratization in the current political environment, Robertson closes by challenging the commonly held conceptions of politics in contemporary Russia.

Following Robertson’s presentation, Nadia Diuk of the National Endowment for Democracy offered her questions and comments about this research agenda. Broadly, Diuk wondered if Robertson’s research more captures the maneuvers of political elites or a poorly functioning civil society. Furthermore, she cautioned Robertson from conflating the presence of NGOs with civil society. While Robertson stresses the levels of organization and its relationship with protest, Diuk inquired whether geographic and poulation size of states also impacts the nature of protest. If organization matters, do the timing of organization and the personalities of the organizers affect the nature and level of protest? Finally, as Robertson challenges commonly held assumptions about politics in contemporary Russia, Diuk stressed what degree political culture and “exceptionalism” might drive the organization culture of protests in the Russian Federation.

Related Topics
  • Book
  • Politics
  • Publication
  • Robertson
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

A More Proactive U.S. Approach to the Georgia Conflicts

  • February 16, 2011
View
Next Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Controlling Institutions: International Organizations and the Global Economy (book event)

  • March 27, 2011
  • Randall Stone
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Uncategorized

A Rock and a Hard Place: The Russian Opposition in a Time of War | New Voices on Eurasia with Jeremy Ladd (April 11)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • March 30, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Russia Program at GW (IERES)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • March 10, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Uncategorized

The Evolving Concerns of Russians after the Invasion | New Voices on Eurasia with Sasha de Vogel (March 9)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • March 5, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

PONARS Eurasia Spring Policy Conference (March 3)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • March 2, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukrainathon 2023 (Feb. 24-25)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • February 21, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

How Putin has shrugged off unprecedented economic sanctions over Russia’s war in Ukraine – for now

  • Peter Rutland
  • February 21, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • February 13, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Why Still Pro-Russia? Making Sense of Hungary’s and Serbia’s Pro-Russia Stance

  • Marlene Laruelle and Helena Ivanov
  • February 9, 2023

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.