PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

A Farewell to Meseberg?

  • November 28, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

The head of the Moldovan Parliament, Marian Lupu, speaking at the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Berlin, did his best to demonstrate his country’s commitment to Europe: we have no alternative to modifying institutions to make them more democratic, he said. He knew to use the catchiest and most indispensable words in the Europeanization discourse: tolerance, protection of minorities, rule of law, etc.

Of course, to declare a commitment to European values is easier than adjusting the Moldovan administrative and economic institutions to EU standards, but the government in Chisinau works hard to confirm its reputation as one of the few success stories in the entire Eastern Partnership. (Such reformist measures and institutional preconditions in general are not required by Russia for joining the Eurasian Union.) What details did Lupu provide about Moldova’s difficult path?

First, why is a visa-free arrangement with the EU so important to Chisinau? Lupu himself admitted that almost one fourth of his compatriots have already fled the country, while the majority of those who remained hold Romanian passports. Quite interestingly, for the sake of political correctness, he did not venture to comment on the passport policy of Bucharest, which gives Moldovans more freedom of travel than their own government. As Lupu admitted, the alternative to visa facilitation is either Moldovans would circulate across Europe with Moldovan or with Romanian documents. But does it matter indeed?

Second, “we don’t have an identity crisis,” Lupu claimed, “we strive for a civic Moldovan nation embedded in Europe.” Sounds good, but Moldovans speak the language that they attribute to their neighboring country, and hold its passport en masse. Is this not an identity issue?

Third, in Lupu’s words, integration with the EU does not challenge Moldova’s relations with its eastern neighbors. He sees no contradictions in having free trade areas with both the EU and the Eurasian Union. As a political statement it sounds great, but economists would most likely disagree. Besides, he himself admitted that Chisinau needs a clear European perspective to show the citizens of Transniestria the difference and incite their motivation for reunification – but this makes sense only if the EU and the Eurasian Union are seen as alternative and competing projects, hardly compatible with each other.

Of course, Lupu’s main messages concerning the frozen conflict with Transniestria were addressed to Germany. He suggested that Moscow’s intention to open its consulate in Tiraspol may be viewed as a deviation from the very idea of the German–Russia Meseberg initiative, which was launched in 2010. He reiterated the idea of changing the existing format of peace-keeping forces into civilian observers supervised within the “5+2” mechanism.

The most substantial question is how does all of this resonate to German policy audiences? Many Germans feel that deepening EU integration is currently more important than expanding the Union. Some are skeptical about the forthcoming accession of Croatia, which is quite understandable against the background of the Greek crisis. Negotiations with Montenegro, Serbia, and Albania are slow and complicated. But as Gernot Erler, a deputy head of the SPD fraction in the German Bundestag, assumed, a pre-accession strategy for Moldova seems feasible.

Yet an even larger puzzle looms: the closer Moldova bonds with the EU, the tougher the position of Moscow becomes. The Kremlin recently sent a clear message to Chisinau: should Moldova opt for “giving up its sovereignty” (i.e., join a supranational organization), Russia would reconsider its current position on Transniestria. This warning signal can possibly mean even stronger support for the independence of this break-away territory and attempts to reposition it within the framework of the Eurasian Union project. Russia is disinterested in fostering the Meseberg initiative, which already seems to be history. It only remains to hope that at sometime Russia’s position on Transniestria will be studied as a case of unfortunate misperceptions in foreign policy. How otherwise can it be explained that a great power’s intentional desire to sacrifice its security relations with major EU member states is just for the sake of supporting a small, unrecognized, and indebted territory?

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • Makarychev
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Violence & Irregular Wars in Western Ukraine

  • November 26, 2012
  • Sergiy Kudelia
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Kimberly Marten Discusses Warlordism on NYC Radio Show

  • November 28, 2012
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.