PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
Contacts
Address 1957 E St NW, Washington, DC 20052 adminponars@gwu.edu 202.994.5915
NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Putin’s Rules of the Game: The Pitfalls of Russia’s New Constitution

    View
  • In the Caucasus, There Is a Peace Agreement but Not Peace

    View
  • Russia’s Niche Soft Power: Sources, Targets and Channels of Influence

    View
  • A Weak Link in NATO? Bulgaria, Russia, and the Lure of Espionage

    View
  • Russia’s Weak Strongman: The Perilous Bargains That Keep Putin in Power

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • How is the Russian Government Coping with Rising Food Prices? [Lipman Series 2021] March 15, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Anton Tabakh about rising food prices in Russia, and what they might mean for Russia's current and future stability.
  • The Communist Party of the Russian Federation: More Than Just Systemic Opposition? [Lipman Series 2021] March 5, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Felix Light and Nikolay Petrov about the contemporary Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including the divisions between its leadership and membership, its attitude toward Alexei Navalny, and why it might be more than just "systemic" opposition after all.
  • Internet Resources: Civic Communication and State Surveillance [Lipman Series 2021] February 16, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Andrei Soldatov and Tanya Lokot about the role of the internet in contemporary Russian politics, including both as a tool of the Russian opposition and as an instrument of the increasingly repressive Russian regime.
  • The Rise of Alexei Navalny's Political Stature and Mass Protest in Russia [Lipman Series 2021] February 1, 2021
    In the first PONARS Eurasia Podcast of 2021, Maria Lipman chats with Greg Yudin about the current protests taking place in Russia, and what Alexei Navalny's growing popular support means for the Putin regime.
  • Russian Social Policy in the COVID-19 Era [Lipman Series 2020] December 21, 2020
    In 2020’s final episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sarah Wilson Sokhey and Ella Paneyakh to discuss Russian social policy in the COVID-19 era, and public perception of Russia’s overall pandemic response.
  • Conscious Parenting Practices in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2020] December 10, 2020
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Julia Yuzbasheva and Maria Danilova to learn more about the proliferation of "conscious parenting" practices in contemporary Russian society.
  • The Transformation of Belarussian Society [Lipman Series 2020] November 11, 2020
    In this episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Masha Lipman chats with Grigory Ioffe about the long-term and short-term factors that led up to the current protests in Belarus, and the ongoing transformation of Belarussian society.
  • Russian Lawmakers Adjust National Legislation to the Revised Constitutional Framework [Lipman Series 2020] October 26, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about ongoing changes to Russia’s national legislation based on the recently revised constitutional framework, and what these changes portend for the 2021 Duma election.
  • Russia's Regional Elections [Lipman Series 2020] September 25, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Graeme Robertson and Konstantin Gaaze about Russia’s September 13 regional elections and whether or not the Kremlin should be worried about upcoming Duma elections.
  • Understanding the Protests in Belarus [Lipman Series 2020] September 11, 2020
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Natalya Chernyshova (University of Winchester) and Nikolay Petrov (Chatham House) about the ongoing protests in Belarus, and what they mean for the future of the current regime.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

A Farewell to Meseberg?

  • November 28, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

The head of the Moldovan Parliament, Marian Lupu, speaking at the Friedrich Ebert Foundation in Berlin, did his best to demonstrate his country’s commitment to Europe: we have no alternative to modifying institutions to make them more democratic, he said. He knew to use the catchiest and most indispensable words in the Europeanization discourse: tolerance, protection of minorities, rule of law, etc.

Of course, to declare a commitment to European values is easier than adjusting the Moldovan administrative and economic institutions to EU standards, but the government in Chisinau works hard to confirm its reputation as one of the few success stories in the entire Eastern Partnership. (Such reformist measures and institutional preconditions in general are not required by Russia for joining the Eurasian Union.) What details did Lupu provide about Moldova’s difficult path?

First, why is a visa-free arrangement with the EU so important to Chisinau? Lupu himself admitted that almost one fourth of his compatriots have already fled the country, while the majority of those who remained hold Romanian passports. Quite interestingly, for the sake of political correctness, he did not venture to comment on the passport policy of Bucharest, which gives Moldovans more freedom of travel than their own government. As Lupu admitted, the alternative to visa facilitation is either Moldovans would circulate across Europe with Moldovan or with Romanian documents. But does it matter indeed?

Second, “we don’t have an identity crisis,” Lupu claimed, “we strive for a civic Moldovan nation embedded in Europe.” Sounds good, but Moldovans speak the language that they attribute to their neighboring country, and hold its passport en masse. Is this not an identity issue?

Third, in Lupu’s words, integration with the EU does not challenge Moldova’s relations with its eastern neighbors. He sees no contradictions in having free trade areas with both the EU and the Eurasian Union. As a political statement it sounds great, but economists would most likely disagree. Besides, he himself admitted that Chisinau needs a clear European perspective to show the citizens of Transniestria the difference and incite their motivation for reunification – but this makes sense only if the EU and the Eurasian Union are seen as alternative and competing projects, hardly compatible with each other.

Of course, Lupu’s main messages concerning the frozen conflict with Transniestria were addressed to Germany. He suggested that Moscow’s intention to open its consulate in Tiraspol may be viewed as a deviation from the very idea of the German–Russia Meseberg initiative, which was launched in 2010. He reiterated the idea of changing the existing format of peace-keeping forces into civilian observers supervised within the “5+2” mechanism.

The most substantial question is how does all of this resonate to German policy audiences? Many Germans feel that deepening EU integration is currently more important than expanding the Union. Some are skeptical about the forthcoming accession of Croatia, which is quite understandable against the background of the Greek crisis. Negotiations with Montenegro, Serbia, and Albania are slow and complicated. But as Gernot Erler, a deputy head of the SPD fraction in the German Bundestag, assumed, a pre-accession strategy for Moldova seems feasible.

Yet an even larger puzzle looms: the closer Moldova bonds with the EU, the tougher the position of Moscow becomes. The Kremlin recently sent a clear message to Chisinau: should Moldova opt for “giving up its sovereignty” (i.e., join a supranational organization), Russia would reconsider its current position on Transniestria. This warning signal can possibly mean even stronger support for the independence of this break-away territory and attempts to reposition it within the framework of the Eurasian Union project. Russia is disinterested in fostering the Meseberg initiative, which already seems to be history. It only remains to hope that at sometime Russia’s position on Transniestria will be studied as a case of unfortunate misperceptions in foreign policy. How otherwise can it be explained that a great power’s intentional desire to sacrifice its security relations with major EU member states is just for the sake of supporting a small, unrecognized, and indebted territory?

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Andrey Makarychev
Andrey Makarychev
Website | + posts
Professor of Regional Political Science, University of Tartu
Affiliation

University of Tartu, Estonia
Links

Johan Skytte Institute (Bio), "PONARS as a Transnational Epistemic Community: An Insider's View" (2010 article)
Expertise

Russian Foreign and Security Policies, EU-Russian Relations, Issues of Regionalism and Federalism
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    The Minsk–Khabarovsk nexus: Ethical, performative, corporeal
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    Twigg: I worry about whether or not people are going to be willing to take Sputnik V in Russia
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    Culture as an Instrument
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    The Coronavirus and the Future of Liberalism
Related Topics
  • Makarychev
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Violence & Irregular Wars in Western Ukraine

  • November 26, 2012
  • Sergiy Kudelia
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Kimberly Marten Discusses Warlordism on NYC Radio Show

  • November 28, 2012
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 22, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Авторитарные режимы не вечны: О ситуации в Белоруссии

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 14, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

В Беларуси пока что все идет по российскому сценарию

  • Olexiy Haran
  • August 12, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Опасная игра Лукашенко

  • Pavel Baev
  • August 11, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть справилась

  • Sergei Medvedev
  • August 10, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Непереломный момент: Смена Конституции

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 6, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Кейс Фургала и три мифа режима

  • Kirill Rogov
  • August 5, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.