PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Russia Program at GW (IERES)

    View
  • The Evolving Concerns of Russians after the Invasion | New Voices on Eurasia with Sasha de Vogel (March 9)

    View
  • PONARS Eurasia Spring Policy Conference (March 3)

    View
  • Ukrainathon 2023 (Feb. 24-25)

    View
  • How Putin has shrugged off unprecedented economic sanctions over Russia’s war in Ukraine – for now

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

A Space for Debate Between Russians Themselves

  • November 2, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

If there is no room for dialogue between political opponents in Russia, perhaps they can communicate in a more convenient environment—Europe. Along with the Germany–Russia dialogue at a recent conference in Berlin (“Autumn Russian–German Encounters”) there was healthy space for debate between Russians themselves. The moderator made sure to give the floor to Russian who participated in the protest movements and also to those seeking to explain the logic of the Kremlin’s discourse.

To rile the crowd, Ilya Ponomariov of the “Just Russia” party rhetorically asked the German audience: “Shall I tell you where people like Igor Sechin keep their money? Why here, in Europe.” Tatiana Romanova, a reputed journalist and the founder of the “Imprisoned Russia” movement, added that the regime in Russia will sooner or later change, and that indeed places like Germany need to be prepared for inquiries about the bank accounts of Russia’s elite.

Svetlana Makovetskaya, head of the “Grani” NGO in Perm, fiercely lambasted the Kremlin’s openly restrictive policy toward civil society organizations, saying: “Something is wrong with those people who think that foreign-funded NGOs are a danger for the Russian statehood, while foreign-funded religious organizations – exempted from the new legislation on “foreign agents” – are not. Something is wrong with those who deem that project sponsors necessarily pre-determine and presage their effects – this could have been possible only in completely hierarchical structures effaced by globalization. The Kremlin’s mentality is too mechanical and too Soviet-style.”

Where are the voices of those former government “liberals” like Sergey Kirienko or Anatoly Chubais, who a decade ago talked so much about project-thinking, cross—border networking, policy transfers, and other such “suddenly” forgotten matters. This view was fully supported by political geographer Dmitry Oreshkin of the Moscow “Merkator Group” who suggested that it is close to impossible to “buy” professional analysts that have a high reputation. It is equally impossible, he said, to expect that those who you employ will tell you the truth. Then he sarcastically gave a piece of advice to the Kremlin: the biggest problem for the regime is not NGOs but a more “liquid” and omnipresent milieu: social networks. By looking for “foreign agents” in the non-commercial sector, the Kremlin discredits itself and only deepens the already existing split within society.

In other words, the Kremlin will not be able to win its game that it is playing with its own population.

A drastically different interpretation was presented by Olga Kryshtanovskaya, a sociologist who recently left the Kremlin’s “United Russia” party, though she still is an adviser to the presidential administration. Kryshtanovskaya didn’t hide the fact that she came to Berlin to articulate the kremlin’s logic. Her spiel started with a path-dependency explanation of centuries-long authoritarianism in Russia, an old argument by those resisting changes and longing for proverbial “stability.”

Then she claimed that Putin does have enemies whom he deprived of their property, including, for example, the Luzhkov group. In this interpretation, it is these people who rock the boat and launch information wars against the regime (being in Europe, Kryshtanovskaya didn’t dare claim that such tactics are sponsored abroad).

The people around Putin, Kryshtanovskaya continued, require him to be tough. In her view, this is what power is about – each side applies those instruments that it finds appropriate. If this pro-Kremlin sociologist is right, then so are those who expect mass repressions.

This exchange of views made clear that the opposition and the Kremlin disagree on all key political concepts. In Kryshtanovskaya’s view, the opposition fights for power. But is power the key incentive for hundreds of thousands Russian street protestors? Should each attempt to criticize something and demand justice be marked as an explicitly political move? Do peaceful protestors, as Kryshtanovskaya claimed, cross “a red line” that justifies the force and suppression?

By essentially saying that NGOs can live calmly unless they enter into the political field, we see the unmasked appeal for the total depoliticization of Russian society.

At one point, the opposition speakers were unexpectedly besieged by a group of young Russians from “Sut Vremeni” (“Essence of Time”) movement. Led by their vociferous nationalist, Sergey Kurginian. Their tactic was to sabotage the debate by asking intentionally lengthy and inappropriate questions in order to deviate the discussion from its core themes. For example, they tried to question the importance of the opposition on the grounds of its numerical minority. According to their spiel, more than 80 percent of Russians are in favor of restoring the Soviet system. Their various claims were weird and misleading.

The good news is that Russian are practicing free speech, at least abroad, and that even people close to the Kremlin, like Kryshtanovskaya, understand that the regime cannot keep giving guarantees to its loyalists.

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • Makarychev
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The United Arab Emirates as an Alternative Trade and Investment Partner in Central Asia

  • November 1, 2012
  • Sebastien Peyrouse
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Escape from Freedom

  • November 2, 2012
  • Sergiy Kudelia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

  • Irina Busygina
  • February 8, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.