PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Away with Political Simulacra?

  • September 4, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

What Russia and the EU share, even having drifted apart from each other in most policy spheres, are unfulfilled (or simply wrong) expectations. Indeed, intensive discourse on Russia’s European vocation did not bring so far fruits, as many in Brussels or Berlin have expected. And trade and economic interdependence does not automatically translate into political cooperation, as the Kremlin anticipated.

This may sound quite pessimistic, but skepticism and pessimism are exactly the feelings that dominate in today’s German approach to Russia. The most recent evidence of this came at the conference on prospects of German – Polish – Russian relations convened a few days ago at University of Potsdam.

Conference organizer Professor Jochen Franzkewas was quite straightforward in his assessments of the current state of German-Russian relations: they are very negative. Germany lost confidence in Russian leaders, which turned “strategic partnership” into a term without content. Berlin’s recognition of Russia’s possible contribution to stabilizing some regions of Eurasia does not go as far as accepting Russia’s sphere of interests. The search for a new agreement between Russia and the EU is stalled due to divergent approaches to it: Brussels wants this document to be as detailed as possible, while Moscow seems to be interested in a relatively short agreement needed basically for legitimizing the Kremlin’s international status and leaving to it as much freedom of action as possible.

Stefan Meister from the Berlin-based think tank DGAP, shared this dreary appraisal by claiming that we have to face the end of a strategic partnership between the EU and Russia. In his opinion, Russia is losing Germany as its key advocate in Europe. German political class is frustrated by the lack of positive news from Moscow. For most German companies, a partnership with Gazprom is viewed as inflexible. Many issue areas declared as parts of bilateral relations are in fact simulacra, or simply soap bubbles. For instance, even experts are unsure of the “legal dialogue” between Russia and Germany. The same goes for a “dialogue between civil societies” – does it exist at all?

Russia, according to pro-Kremlin speakers, does not need to learn from European experiences. One example discussed at the conference is muliticulturalism. Perhaps, more or less successful multi-ethnic relations are possible only on the basis of grass-roots self-organization on the local (communal, municipal, regional) level. It is here that the Putin system demonstrates its limits: in the absence of a fully-fledged local democracy, it is the state that tries to secure ethnic and religious peace in a top-down manner. But, the European lesson is that the state can’t be the sole constructor of a multi-cultural society. Rather, it can only set certain frames to be filled with specific content by local communities themselves.

In Meister’s view, Russia is not soley at fault for itsdeplorable lack of understanding with Europe. Germany shares part of blame, since it is short of vision and due expertise, and its Ostpolitik is very much elite-driven. Russia is not a personal priority for chancellor Angela Merkel or President Joachim Gauk, who is reluctant to travel to Russia and speak withVladimir Putin. Merkel might criticize her predecessors, but never developed an alternative approach to Russia. Eventually, it was Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski who took his German counter-part Guido Westerwelle to Belarus a year ago, not the other way around.

Of course, the federal government in Berlin tries to balance between the two dominating domestic groups. The value-based camp thinks that Germany’s priority lies in political domain, and Germany must more robustly raise issues of democracy and human rights while talking to the Kremlin. The Realpolitik camp deems that Germany benefits a lot from Russia’s energy supplies, and the only problem in bilateral relations is unfortunate but corrigible miscommunication. It is the first camp that seems to get prominence nowadays, since the criticism of their opponents is on the rise.

Of course, other voices weigh in on this debate. For example, critical voices from Poland, the closest foreign policy partner of Germany, are also strong. Many Poles see Germany rather as a mediator between the EU and its neighbors, yet not as a fully-fledged part of the EU. Also, Ukrainians are much more critical toward the EU and Germany, claiming that from the outset, Ukraine was not high in the EU agenda.

The conference proceedings offer a sober perspective for EU’s relations with Russia. Wishful thinking does not work, and this has to be recognized by all parties. One of the games that Russia has played with Europe consisted in loudly declaring some kind of mega-project, followed up by actions that make EU skeptical of Russian initiatives. This was the case of the European Security Treaty proposed by ex-President Medvedev—it remained only on paper due to evidently low quality of articulation of the idea and, more importantly, to Russia’s disinterest in accepting the Meseberg initiative as an institutional follow-up of Medvedev’s proposal. The same outcome might happen with the Russian demands for abolishing visas. after the Eurasian Union plans were announced, the EU might become even more skeptical about visa-free regime with Russia. Putin’s idea of a unified economic space from Lisbon to Vladivostok appears to be another mega-project with scarce chances for implementation. Perhaps, instead of strategic partnership, what Russia and the EU need is a strategic pause.

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • EU
  • Makarychev
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Security and development approaches to Central Asia

  • September 1, 2012
  • Marlene Laruelle
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Russia’s Soft Power: Beyond Kalinka-Malinka

  • September 5, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.