PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Russia Program at GW (IERES)

    View
  • The Evolving Concerns of Russians after the Invasion | New Voices on Eurasia with Sasha de Vogel (March 9)

    View
  • PONARS Eurasia Spring Policy Conference (March 3)

    View
  • Ukrainathon 2023 (Feb. 24-25)

    View
  • How Putin has shrugged off unprecedented economic sanctions over Russia’s war in Ukraine – for now

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

East Europe Orientation Pause Opens Fortochkas* for the United States

  • July 19, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

Eastern Europe is a very volatile region with interests and identities of key actors far from stationary. Being pro-Russian or pro-European is a matter of interpretation. Is Ukraine’s Viktor Yanukovich pro-Russian? Are Romania’s Traian Basescu, Czech Republic’s Vaclav Klaus, and Hungary’s Viktor Orban unequivocally pro-European? These uneasy questions were reconnoitered in an appropriate location, Odessa, Ukraine, during a two-week summer school for young University educators (“The EU as a Security Actor”).

To begin with, Europe has troubles. The U.S. is giving attention to the Asian-Pacific region, making some European analysts uncertain about trans-Atlantic relations. China is a more active investor in many EU countries. EU institutions need bolstering. Some of the EU’s closest neighbors (Turkey and Egypt, for example) are increasingly eager to build their own policies toward the EU, instead of accepting EU’s normative recipes.

And of course, there’s Ukraine, a country ruled by a “Family” of a dozen of the closest associates of the president. Igor Koval, the Rector of Mechnikov National University in Odessa, says that neither of Yanukovich’s predecessors went as far as he is in concentrating power.

Sadly for the good citizens of Ukrainians, the EU has been gradually losing interest in cooperation with this country, as one participant suggested, with the reason being (partly) that Ukraine is unlikely to fall into Russia’s sphere of influence.

Neither Germany nor Poland – the only two EU member states with well-articulated Eastern policies – has serious political influence on Kyiv. Instead of its proclaimed “more for more policy,” the EU attitude to Ukraine is more like “nothing for nothing.”

Earlier, we wondered if the EU would flex its muscles at Ukraine around the Euro-2012 football games, but now we can say that Yanukovich’s regime was not pressured and did not suffer. Is this how “Lukashenkos” are formed? Gunter Waltzenbach of Bristol University argued for adaptation and learning as the guiding principles of EU’s policy in Eastern Europe. Volodymir Dubovik of Odessa National University riposted that the EU is adapting too much to its authoritarian neighbors, thus losing its normative core.

Economics are keys to understanding Eastern Europe’s orientations. Apparently, the government in Kyiv does understand the Greek lesson: weak economies face the prospect of absorption by major economic players. This is why Ukraine needs partners above and beyond the EU and Russia. Thus, in one participant’s words, Kyiv is left with an option of cooperating more closely with the United States, which may be an easier partner than those flanking it.

However, Ukraine is not a priority for the United States. Still, Washington carries great weight in Eastern European geopolitics and geoeconomics. Not incidentally, the Obama administration criticized Yanukovich about the Yulia Timoshenko trial a bit less sharply than the EU.

Turning to Russia, what is it striving for in its “near abroad?” The experts at the conference were unable to say whether Russia seeks an economic or political union.

Is the Eurasian Union blueprint a PR project or a demonstration of Russia’s imperial inertia? Rather I would say it is a mix of spheres-of-influence and technocratic approaches. Moscow is very hesitant to make political moves, especially in situations of “frozen conflicts.” Yet, Moscow is unhappy with the EU developing its own policies in Eurasia.

Presumably, some Russian politicians would like Russia’s neighbors to face a false dilemma – either integrate in Russia-patronized institutions or go West.

I remember that some time ago, Dmitry Medvedev tried to force Ukraine into making this decision: either stay with Russia or opt for Europe; interestingly, it was Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov who disavowed this statement. Yet false dilemmas are unfortunately still alive.

Of course, the problem lies not in the EU with its modest Eastern Partnership resources, but in the lack of incentives from the Russian side. So far, the Eastern Partnership offers six countries nothing that would prevent them from cooperating with Russia.

In short, Russia’s foreign policy thinking lacks conceptual clarity, which is due to its predominantly technocratic nature. The Kremlin is weak in converting its economic inflows into political outflows. When it tries to be pragmatic, good results do not follow – neither in relations with the EU nor with its “near abroad.” When it tries to add more ideological tones to its policies, results are worse (e.g., isolation).

Russian Vice Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin’s recent remark on twitter that it is “our people” who live in Transniestria is a case in point here about hidden appeals, debt, and a foreign policy underlined by Russian energy supplies.

Presumably, Moscow may want to take advantage of the current weakness of the EU, which is enmeshed in domestic financial troubles, but the key European country, Germany, still has its its Eastern European and Caucasus Ostpolitik.

*A “fortochka” is a small ventilation window . Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • Europe
  • Makarychev
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Russian warships head off on exercise, not to prop up Assad

  • July 12, 2012
  • Dmitry Gorenburg
View
Next Article
  • Policy Perspectives

Conference Briefing Book

  • July 23, 2012
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

  • Irina Busygina
  • February 8, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.