PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Forging Ukraine’s Neighborhood Agenda: The German Connection

  • December 4, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

The debate on the forthcoming Ukrainian OSCE chairmanship held at the DGAP think tank in Berlin nicely illustrates the power of Europeanization: the agenda of the holder of the rotating EU Council Presidency, one of the most important of international organizations, is shaped not unilaterally, but in conjunction with German experts and diplomats, who are arguably among the most influential policymakers in today’s Europe.

For example, German speakers at the event did not hide their intention to influence the Ukrainian OSCE agenda. Herbert Salber, Director for Security Policy in the German Foreign Office, assumed that as soon as NATO leaves Afghanistan, there will be more room for the OSCE in Central Asia—and Ukraine ought to be concerned about this.

Germany also wants to use the opportunity for engaging Ukraine in reaching solutions for Transniestria and Nagorno-Karabakh, as well as in contacts with the new Georgian government. This resembles the German attempts a year ago to lure Poland, which held the EU Council Chairmanship, to be more involved in the Caucasus and other volatile regions.

Yet, Leonid Kozhara, the Deputy Speaker for Foreign Policy in the Ukrainian Parliament, changed the tone of DGAP discussion when he said: “We welcome Germany’s role in streamlining the agenda of the Ukrainian OSCE chairmanship, but let’s start with the Association Agreement first.” He went on to say that Russia has its own voice in the debate, suggesting that Ukraine should push for restarting the debate on the European Security Treaty as proposed by Moscow some time ago.

The implication of his remarks were evidently political: a Ukrainian politician called on Germany to make a political decision of ignoring what in the mildest terms can be dubbed selective justice, and alluded that Ukraine itself has a political alternative to heeding Germany (e.g., Russia).

Kozhara added, “We are under strong pressure from Moscow, which won’t wait until we implement reforms—Russia wants us now and in full. If this succeeds, a new version of the USSR can come true.” This view was supported by Vyacheslav Yatsiuk, Head of the OSCE Task Force at the Ukrainian Foreign Ministry), when he said that by procrastinating the Association Agreement, the EU, in fact, encourages Russia’s activities toward Ukraine.

Yet Kozhara himself certainly didn’t think of his words as rendering political effects. He called for “less politics and more economic pragmatism.” He tried to present a non-political view on Europe by the “ordinary people in Ukraine” as the most authentic and trustworthy. For them, he claimed, the EU is largely associated with closed markets and visa formalities. Kozhara calls the EU restrictions an example of politicization, which is definitely a pejorative word in the Ukrainian lexicon.

Yet if Ukrainian society (including business circles) do not like the EU, why bother? Why does the government always demonstrates its commitments to the European choice?  There will be soon be a declaration by the Ukrainian parliament that seeks the nation to sign the Association Agreement in the nearest future. Is this a cry from the heart?

There was another controversial facet of Kozhara’s speech. He presumed that it is the Germans who ought to think over what went wrong with EU–Ukrainian relations. He believes that there are no impediments for signing the Association Agreement from the Ukrainian side. The Ukrainian government took all the steps it had to for legal approximations with the EU. They feel that the Euro-2012 football tournament was a proof of Ukraine’s ability to organize mega-events, while the October 2012 parliamentary election was a new step toward democracy.

Reaction from the audience followed immediately, such as: “you imply that what Ukrainian did for reforms is a gift to Europe, but you should do these irrespective of EU expectations.”

To many conference participants, obstacles to the Association Agreement from the Ukrainian side abound, above all its selective, Soviet-style justice system.

Reinhold Brender, of the European External Action Service, reminded everyone that the preliminary findings of the 2012 electoral observers were critical.

Thus, after these exchanges the discussions went explicitly political. Arguably, it was bound to, due to the nature of the topic.

Valery Chaliy from the Razumkov Center admitted that the choice his country faces is not economic, but civilizational. Western Ukraine would never agree with integration with Russia, which would mean instability at the EU border. The Eurasian choice is almost for free, while the European scenario demands political efforts.

The situation looks political from the European side as well. One cannot but agree with Ukrainian experts that the EU lacks a strategic vision for its relationship with Ukraine. This might prompt a Belarusian scenario of isolation and conservation of an authoritarian regime.

The conceptual core of the disagreements between Germany and Ukraine boils down to the contradictions between the “thick” and “thin” conceptions of international society. The former presupposes that actors are deeply embedded in normative structure that, to some extent, limit their freedom of action, while the later leaves institutional commitments at a minimal level for the sake of more room for individual policies. Pleas for pragmatism from Kyiv could resonate only within the concept of a “thin” international society, which the EU does not share. Of course Germany can consider pragmatic options, but it is heavily constrained in its policies toward Eastern Europe by deeply normative considerations, and can’t easily break with them, even for the sake of economic rationales.

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • Makarychev
Previous Article
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Восстанавливая братские связи: Турецко-азербайджанские отношения в сфере энергетики

  • December 1, 2012
  • Suhnaz Yilmaz
View
Next Article
  • Policy Memos | Аналитика

Пробуждается ли российское общество?

  • December 4, 2012
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.