PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • Membership | Core
      • Membership | Collegium
      • Membership | Associates
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • Membership | Core
      • Membership | Collegium
      • Membership | Associates
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
  • Russia’s war in Ukraine threatens students daily and forces teachers to improvise

    View
  • Prevailing Soviet Legacies

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Is There Willful Misinterpretation of FARA in Russia?

  • May 13, 2013
  • PONARS Eurasia

PONARS Eurasia members discuss the Russian Duma's “foreign agent” NGO law and references to the U.S. Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA; 1938).


  • The FARA database can be searched here: http://www.fara.gov/quick-search.html
  • U.S. embassy overview about FARA and U.S. laws on NGO foreign funding: http://egypt.usembassy.gov/ngos.html


Comments by PONARS Eurasia members:

— The FARA database covers all listings for the entire 75 years FARA has been in force. Out of 379 active listings, there are almost no entities that would really be described as an NGO, at least in the way we use it. The exceptions are the World Zionist Organization (registered since 1971), the All-Pakistan Muslim League (registered since 2011), the Arab Information Center (registered on behalf of the Arab League since 1955), the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Party (registered since 1993), the Friends of Sinn Fein (registered since 1995), the Native American Rights Fund (registered since 1993), the Syrian Future Movement (registered since Nov. 2012), the Thy Hashemite Sovereign Royal Family of Iraq Office in the USA (registered since 2011), the U.S. Office of the National Coalition of Syrian Revolution and Opposition Forces (registered since April 2013), and the United Lao Council for Peace, Freedom, and Reconstruction (registered since Sept. 2012).

Law firms, lobbying/public-relations firms, and government-sponsored tourism/business development bureaus account for the vast majority of listings, and many of the entities listed seem superfluous (e.g., does anyone doubt that the Italian Government Tourism Bureau works for the Italian government?). A few listings are amusing/strange — e.g., the American Palm Oil Council is an entity of the Malaysian government and has been registered since 1991.

I looked at all the listings for the USSR (303 of them, though this is markedly overstated because of all the duplication). These, too, were almost entirely public-relations firms (e.g., the PR firm Burson Marsteller first registered as working for the USSR in 1973) and law firms, plus some entities whose listings seemed superfluous (e.g., did anyone doubt that the New York bureau of TASS or the U.S. bureau of Radio Moscow was working for the Soviet government?).

In short, there is no doubt that FARA is very narrowly construed and is being grossly misrepresented (deliberately in many cases). All this said, the question of whether FARA is worth preserving is a different matter. I have long regarded it as a quaint relic of World War II and the Cold War.


— The "foreign agent law" must not be considered in isolation. It is just one instance in an established pattern of manipulation/misperception that works very well at the domestic level.

Other recent examples include references to legal protection of "religious feelings" in European countries (in particular, Germany) in the context of the Pussy Riot case, the constant invocation of the Hyde Park in London (in the context of the law on public manifestations), and manipulation with statistics (Putin's famous reference to "nearly one billion dollars" allegedly received by the NGOs from abroad, the number of children adopted from Russia who died in the U.S., etc., etc.).

My take on it is that it is a combination of both deliberate manipulation and misunderstanding. Those who come up with these justifications probably understand very well what they are doing, but many of those who implement repressive measures just do not give themselves the labor of figuring it out. It fits very well in their general (and not totally unjustified) attitude to the West as inherently hostile or at least unfair toward Russia. In a freer country, many of these myths would be easily destroyed by the government's opponents.

We live in a world of myths, and many of them come in very handy when someone wants to justify a controversial political move.


— The Russian government cannot use FARA as justification for its “foreign agents law.” It is an obvious point, but the U.S. distinguishes between organizations that receive foreign funding and the narrower notion of an “agent of a foreign principal” that “works for” the foreign principal. Foreign funding does not make one automatically an “agent of a foreign principal.


— It is also notable that the NGOs in the database are certainly or likely transnational running a branch in the US. Even if not, and they are incorporated only in the US, their names contain explicit references to a foreign government or a partisan group.

In the Russian case, the foreign agent tag is designed exclusively for Russian-incorporated NGOs that only operate domestically. Branches of foreign NGOs are not targeted by the foreign agent law (only to an extent by the anti-Magnitsky law).


— The key point here is that FARA covers entities that seek to directly engage in policymaking (i.e., lobbying) rather than contributing to public discourse. In Russia, the law covers everyone who has any political interests. The other difference is the concept of a grant. While contracts and grants in Russia differ in legal status, where it comes to politics they are regarded as basically the same: payment for specific activities in the interests of the funding entity (I.e., a hire).


— A case in point: the list of funders of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace includes a number of foreign governments, corporations, and individuals. Carnegie explicitly works to influence policy. And it is not registered under FARA. 

http://carnegieendowment.org/about/development/index.cfm?fa=funders

Over the last year or so, there have been a number of articles and op-eds published in Russia on this subject, including links and other references to the publicly available FARA register. As far as I am concerned, any residual 'misunderstanding' at high levels is willful, not accidental. 


— It is a tactical mistake to invoke FARA. It serves to discredit the Russian government abroad because people know reality.


 

Related Topics
  • FARA
  • NGOs
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Russia’s Recent Caucasus Military Maneuvers: Tempest in a Teapot or Purposeful Trend?

  • May 13, 2013
  • Sergey Minasyan
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

What Surkov’s Ousting Signifies About Russia’s Course in Syria

  • May 14, 2013
  • Pavel Baev
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.