PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Task Forces
    • Amplifying Voices of Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia (AVECCA)
    • Russia in a Changing Climate
    • Ukraine
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Task Forces
    • Amplifying Voices of Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia (AVECCA)
    • Russia in a Changing Climate
    • Ukraine
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Ukraine Task Force: Getting Ukraine Right: From Negotiations Trap to Victory

    View
  • Ensuring Genuine Results? A New Electoral Design in Uzbekistan

    View
  • Ukraine, Taiwan, and Macron’s “Strategic Autonomy”

    View
  • After Violence: Russia’s Beslan School Massacre and the Peace that Followed

    View
  • Ukraine’s Unnamed War: Before the Russian Invasion of 2022

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Leaderless Protest in Armenia

  • July 3, 2015
  • Georgi Derluguian

The dramatic protest mobilization in Armenia last week illustrates how much any social movement is an emotional rollercoaster. The protest was triggered by a 17 percent increase in electricity rates. The price hike would surely hurt many impoverished groups in Armenian society. The youthful urbane protesters, however, did not seem the likeliest victims. Theirs was a matter of principle expressed in the angry, simple name of the new social movement: No to robbery!

To complicate matters, the Armenian electric company is a subsidiary of Russia's state-owned energy holding RAO UES. In recent years, Russian capital has come to own much of Armenia’s very modest economy.

From the right-wing politicians in Moscow, one could immediately hear ominous suggestions that the events in Yerevan could be in fact the beginning of another American-instigated color revolution, which they see as having happened in Ukraine last year.

If there were any parallels with the Euromaidan, however, they perhaps lie in the original “spark”: a group of young activists attempting to picket the entrance to the Presidential Palace were dispersed by police water cannons. Over two hundred were detained for administrative misdemeanors and released a few hours later. Ironically, the use of water cannons proved incendiary for reasons nobody could fully explain. The birth of social movements remains one of the biggest puzzles to social scientists.

Thousands of people rushed to Marshal Bagramyan Prospekt to protect the protestors and shame the police. To everyone’s enormous surprise, the rally ended up comparable to the epic 1988–1990 mobilizations for Karabagh in the heady days of Gorbachev’s perestroika. The snowballing effect was much in evidence: as more people gathered in the center of Yerevan, more people were attracted by the news and to the cause. Mobile phones played a big role. But Yerevan is not that big anyway, and the central location of both the presidency and the parliament on the main street meant that the disruption was immediately felt during the rush hour.

The protesters looked young and romantic. They could not have witnessed the mobilizations of perestroika. But the more senior onlookers felt some mixed feelings and tenderness for the activists. The youth and romanticism of the protestors suggested that they were quite unlikely moved by such a mundane concern as the price of utilities.

Yet protests develop in waves, and this recent surge has been prepared by a series of recent public mobilizations: on environmental issues, preservation matters in the old town, and, above all, attempts to raise the fares of the "marshrutka" minibuses. City-level campaigns such as these passed unnoticed outside Armenia but they surely played critical roles in setting the scene for the present mobilization.

The issue of minibus fares emerged two years ago and involved all city residents since the minibuses are the main means of public transportation. This issue established important precedents and rituals of solidarity: Internet announcements, symbolic group dancing at bus stops, encouraging passengers to refuse paying the new fares, and shaming bus drivers who charged them. One development was that drivers of private cars would approach bus stops and offer free rides while loudly announcing where they were heading. It thus became an inter-generational campaign involving almost all classes of society.

The city had fun for a few days, and then the mayor of Yerevan had to intervene publicly. He asked the minibus owners to account for their hiking of prices. This was a good question because the minibuses were the same ancient wrecks held together by wires and occasionally embellished with shreds of old oriental rugs.

All in all, the protest movement last week began with an enormous emotional charge that was mightily helped by the police use of water cannons. The city instantly felt in solidarity with those protesting downtown. I did not hear a single complaint about traffic disruptions. Curiously, the police chief became his own spokesman saying that the protestors are certainly violating the law but their actions carry no social danger. Later he even said that "they are fighting for all of us." Thus, it became clear that Yerevan was not repeating Kyiv. But, still, where was this heading?

RFE/RL and the internet TV channel "Arachin" began providing around-the-clock coverage that could be heard from the open windows of offices and apartments and nearly every taxi cab. This reminded me of 1989. In a city of about one million residents, the focus of attention was definitely on the protest downtown, and the sentiment was sympathetic (the phrase, “they are fighting for all of us there,” could be heard pervasively).

Thus, the actual number of protesters did not matter that much as long as a few hundred youth manned the barricades of the chained trash cans. Many thousands could have joined in thirty minutes if necessary. Also, this being a time of pleasant early summer evenings, many people opted to spend time at nearby downtown cafes. The Internet surely helped expand the audience—probably to several hundred thousand, including the diaspora. Speaking of which, one “socialist” suggestion, to nationalize under public supervision Armenia's utilities, became popularized by the California-based rock musician Serj Tankian, the legendary leader of the band System of a Down.

The protest movement seemed to have achieved its goal this past weekend when President Sargsyan promised that the government would pay the new electricity prices from its security budget while the issue is re-negotiated. To the credit of Armenia’s state leaders, they prudently resisted blaming any of it on foreigners and instigators. Did they really feel the mood of the nation, after all? With Sargsyan’s announcement, people really hit the streets dancing.

The protest movement had internal challenges. Even at its peak, when there was an estimated 25-40 thousand people on the street, it was not clear who would make the keynote speeches, who would manage the queue of speakers, and what exactly the issues raised should be. The lack of organization and spontaneity that earlier was part of the movement's pride and strength, and which kept it immune from politicking, became a liability once real bargaining actually started.

And then the movement split. Whatever leaders emerged over the previous several days, to the extent that anyone emerged at all, they failed to steer adeptly. A call to move the rally behind the historical Opera House and away from traffic was followed at best by 10 percent of the crowd, and maybe only 3 to 5 percent. The majority remained at Bagramyan Prospekt. Some joy diminished and frustration grew as the newly-made moderates behind the Opera House felt irrelevant, while the leaderless diehards at the barricades yearned for some kind of action that never came. Now, the whole movement seems to be ending, though not quite as effortlessly as it started.

 

Related Topics
  • Armenia
  • Derluguian
Previous Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Cooley: AIIB signifies the start of a new chapter in the evolution of international development

  • July 1, 2015
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Выборы на оккупированных территориях будут признаны лишь при одном условии

  • July 6, 2015
  • Olexiy Haran
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ensuring Genuine Results? A New Electoral Design in Uzbekistan

  • Akrom Avezov
  • May 19, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine, Taiwan, and Macron’s “Strategic Autonomy”

  • Maurizio Delli Santi
  • April 30, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russia’s Regional Governors: Backing the War, Upholding the Status Quo

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • April 7, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

  • Irina Busygina
  • February 8, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.