PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Povetkin vs. Klitschko Boxing Spectacle: A Mirror into Russia-Ukraine Relations?

  • October 18, 2013
  • Andrey Makarychev

Guest post by Boris Lanin and Lana Lanina — Russia’s relations with Ukraine are overloaded with political symbolism, even more so as we get closer to the November Vilnius Eastern Partnership Summit. Last week’s boxing match in Moscow between Russian Alexander Povetkin and Ukrainian Wladimir Klitschko was a clear case of such symbolism.

For decades, high-profile athletic competitions, particularly trans-national ones, have regularly contained political undertones. One example is the 1936 Olympic Games in Berlin, which became the documentary base for Leni Riefenstahl’s classic totalitarian art. And then there was the USSR, which used athletes, sports, and competitions to dramatize the virtues of the communist system’s prowess.

One can agree with sports researcher Mikhail Prozumenschikov when he said that at different times and in different countries an ideological base has been highly visible during sporting events and successes and failures in the stadium have had political repercussions.

[[{“type”:”media”,”view_mode”:”media_original”,”fid”:”1763″,”attributes”:{“alt”:””,”class”:”media-image”,”height”:”360″,”style”:”width: 130px; height: 130px; float: left; margin-left: 3px; margin-right: 3px;”,”typeof”:”foaf:Image”,”width”:”360″}}]]The coverage of the Povetkin–Klitschko fight, broadcast live by Russia’s Channel-One on October 5, 2013, was a blend of commercialized media showmanship, nationalism, and political performance. Let us take a look at how it was staged.

First, the boxers gave their introductory speeches. Klitschko expressed great respect for his opponent, while Povetkin simply chose to announce that he is Russian, pointing out that this is why he is so strong. This exchange of remarks outlined two disjointed messages: political politeness vs. flabby nationalism.

Then the slogan “Sasha Povetkin: Russian Knight” appeared before the public. His appearance was accompanied by an amateur song about “the descendants of Svarog” performed by bearded men dressed as Russian knights. When his robe was removed, he was wearing a grey-and-black T-shirt with a “Russian Knight” logo.

The imagery surrounding Povetkin demonstrated the entire event’s ideological context—the ascendance of a Russian knight, an epic hero, accompanied by a Russian coach, a Russian team, and mysterious Russian-esque music. With so much Russian fanfare, could Povetkin possibly lose? In Vladimir Putin’s Russia, the stage-managed “patriot” rarely loses, right? What would happen if he did?

Wladimir Klitschko, who seemed fully concentrated on the fight, was introduced with an upbeat English-language song performed by a singer from the West. There were no allusions to his Slavic origins or any Slavic history for that matter.

However, Ukrainian nationalism made an appearance when Ukrainian singer Dzhamala—who was once congratulated by Prime MinisterYulia Tymoshenko when she won a regional song competition in 2009—sang an a-cappella version of the Ukrainian national anthem, all the while with a tragic-looking facial expression that matched the extraordinarily seriousness of Klitschko. Dzhamala wore a yellow dress decorated with two blue doves – the colors of the Ukrainian national flag.

The Russian anthem was performed by Iosif Kobzon, a Soviet-era artist and a State Duma member from United Russia, who sounded unusually pompous for a boxing event. In the audience were the royal couple of Monaco and different branches of Russia’s political regime: Rosneft president Igor Sechin, business tycoon and Putin loyalist Gennady Timchenko, patriotic film director Nikita Mikhalkov, singer Aleksander Rozenbaum, and Olympic champion Elena Isinbaeva, who is known for her support of the Kremlin and the Russian “anti-gay” laws.

Through the circus, inside the ring itself, the forces were clearly unequal. Klitschko was more experienced, taller, and more athletic than his Russian opponent.

After Klitschko won, Povetkin licked the blood off his face and promised he would win in a rematch. Klitschko’s speech was booed by the angry spectators, causing the television producers to cut the broadcast (the entire footage is available on YouTube).

And so, the Russian boxer’s painful defeat made it pointless to hold a press-conference after the event—another lapse of good sportsmanship. The fight, for which the winner took home $17 million and the loser $6 million, elucidated the structure of politicized sports performances. Yet these political performances may not always go as planned and not yield the results their designers expect. Now with the Sochi Olympics approaching, it may be best for sports promoters not to over-play the partisan card.

Guest contributors Boris Lanin (Russian Academy of Education, Moscow) and Lana Lanina (European University of Humanities, Vilnius) were invited by Andrey Makarychev.

Related Topics
  • Makarychev
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть хочет извлекать выгоду из миграции

  • October 17, 2013
  • Nikolay Petrov
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Кому выгодно создание псевдофронта в Украине?

  • October 18, 2013
  • Olexiy Haran
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.