PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
Contacts
Address 1957 E St NW, Washington, DC 20052 adminponars@gwu.edu 202.994.5915
NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Preparing for the Parliamentary Elections of 2021: Russian Politics and Society (Gel’man, Lankina, Semenov, Smyth, and more)

    View
  • Russians supported Putin’s moves in Crimea in 2014. Here’s what’s different in 2021

    View
  • Putin’s Rules of the Game: The Pitfalls of Russia’s New Constitution

    View
  • In the Caucasus, There Is a Peace Agreement but Not Peace

    View
  • Russia’s Niche Soft Power: Sources, Targets and Channels of Influence

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • Music and Politics in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2021] April 12, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Gorbachev about the dynamic music scene in contemporary Russia, and how free Russian musicians are to make political statements.
  • How is the Russian Government Coping with Rising Food Prices? [Lipman Series 2021] March 15, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Anton Tabakh about rising food prices in Russia, and what they might mean for Russia's current and future stability.
  • The Communist Party of the Russian Federation: More Than Just Systemic Opposition? [Lipman Series 2021] March 5, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Felix Light and Nikolay Petrov about the contemporary Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including the divisions between its leadership and membership, its attitude toward Alexei Navalny, and why it might be more than just "systemic" opposition after all.
  • Internet Resources: Civic Communication and State Surveillance [Lipman Series 2021] February 16, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Andrei Soldatov and Tanya Lokot about the role of the internet in contemporary Russian politics, including both as a tool of the Russian opposition and as an instrument of the increasingly repressive Russian regime.
  • The Rise of Alexei Navalny's Political Stature and Mass Protest in Russia [Lipman Series 2021] February 1, 2021
    In the first PONARS Eurasia Podcast of 2021, Maria Lipman chats with Greg Yudin about the current protests taking place in Russia, and what Alexei Navalny's growing popular support means for the Putin regime.
  • Russian Social Policy in the COVID-19 Era [Lipman Series 2020] December 21, 2020
    In 2020’s final episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sarah Wilson Sokhey and Ella Paneyakh to discuss Russian social policy in the COVID-19 era, and public perception of Russia’s overall pandemic response.
  • Conscious Parenting Practices in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2020] December 10, 2020
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Julia Yuzbasheva and Maria Danilova to learn more about the proliferation of "conscious parenting" practices in contemporary Russian society.
  • The Transformation of Belarussian Society [Lipman Series 2020] November 11, 2020
    In this episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Masha Lipman chats with Grigory Ioffe about the long-term and short-term factors that led up to the current protests in Belarus, and the ongoing transformation of Belarussian society.
  • Russian Lawmakers Adjust National Legislation to the Revised Constitutional Framework [Lipman Series 2020] October 26, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about ongoing changes to Russia’s national legislation based on the recently revised constitutional framework, and what these changes portend for the 2021 Duma election.
  • Russia's Regional Elections [Lipman Series 2020] September 25, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Graeme Robertson and Konstantin Gaaze about Russia’s September 13 regional elections and whether or not the Kremlin should be worried about upcoming Duma elections.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Social Policy & Regime Type

  • April 27, 2018
  • Sarah Wilson Sokhey

(PONARS Eurasia) Providing things like healthcare and education are among the most basic services that modern governments provide. This makes the study of what is sometimes lumped together as the “welfare state” critical to understanding modern governments. A recent panel at the annual conference of the Midwest Political Science Association in Chicago highlighted some of this research.

As part of a central research project are at the International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow and with funding from the Russian National Science Foundation, Israel Marques, and Thomas Remington have been researching vocational education programs throughout Russian including their political and economic implications. Marques presented research at MPSA showing public-private partnerships do better when state capacity is stronger and there is more competition in a Russian region. In related work about vocational education, Remington demonstrates how certain regions of Russia were able to overcome collective action dilemmas in modernizing their labor forces in order to take advantage of federal policies encouraging a German-style dual education model.

The vocational education research by Marques and Remington lends insight into how policymaking and federal-regional relations work in an authoritarian context where the central government is clearly the driving factor. Even in such a context, regional variation matters tremendously for local policy outcomes. Other recent work by Remington further illuminates differences in authoritarian policymaking by demonstrating why pension policy is characterized by sudden changes while in China pension policy is made through a variety of partial and overlapping changes.

Related to this, my own work with Israel Marques examines the foundations of support for social policy in countries like Russia where government institutions are largely thought to be corrupt and inefficient. Using experimental evidence—conducted both in computer labs and as survey experiments—we find evidence that higher-earners support government redistribution more than they otherwise might if they themselves can more easily avoid paying taxes. In other words, rich people may be fine with the government providing all kinds of public goods as long as they do not have to pay for them.

Work on social policy in the post-communist arena translates to both other regions and other important issues in political science. For instance, research on Asian welfare states by Wei-Ting Yen has emphasized that economic insecurity—the individual risk of falling beneath the poverty line—rather than poverty explains support for the welfare state. This research—like my own with Israel Marques—suggests that many assumptions about why and which welfare programs individuals support have missed important key characteristics.

More broadly, the ability to provide responsive social policies matters for democratization. Both institutional factors influencing—including how center-regional relations work—and individual preferences for social policy, then, may be directly connected to what type of regime emerges. For instance, Flores and Nooruddin show that holding elections proves to be good for democracy when there is a strong history of democratic rule, fiscal resources exist to allow for responsive policies, and the country is free of conflict. Building on this, we might suspect that poorly functioning government institutions undermine the fiscal space and responsiveness of governments which we would prefer to see implementing better designed and better funded social policies which could, in turn, help democracy work better. In short, bad institutions and the subsequently bad social policies may be an important part of the story for why democracy fails. In trying to understand good regimes, we should perhaps first understand good policies.

Sarah Wilson Sokhey is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Colorado, Boulder, a Faculty Associate at the Institute of Behavioral Science, and an Associate Fellow at the International Center for the Study of Institutions and Development at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow, Russia.

Also see by Sarah Sokhey, “When Does Corruption Matter?” April 26, 2018.

Sarah Wilson Sokhey
Sarah Wilson Sokhey
Website | + posts
Assistant Professor
Affiliation

University of Colorado Boulder
Links

University of Colorado Boulder (Bio)
Expertise

Business-State Relations, Comparative Politics, Economic Reform, Pension Reform, Social Policy, Central Asia, Russia
  • Sarah Wilson Sokhey
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/sarah-wilson-sokhey/
    COVID-19 in Russia: What Russians Expected, What They Got, and What They Think About It
  • Sarah Wilson Sokhey
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/sarah-wilson-sokhey/
    Social Policy in Putin’s (Last?) Term
  • Sarah Wilson Sokhey
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/sarah-wilson-sokhey/
    The Political Economy of Pension Policy Reversal in Post-Communist Countries
  • Sarah Wilson Sokhey
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/sarah-wilson-sokhey/
    When Does Corruption Matter?
Related Topics
  • Elections
  • Sokhey
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Putin’s temporary dominance masks uncertain future

  • April 27, 2018
  • Jordan Gans-Morse
View
Next Article
Uncategorized

After Ten Years of Protest in Russia: What Have We Learned?

  • April 30, 2018
  • Regina Smyth
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 22, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Авторитарные режимы не вечны: О ситуации в Белоруссии

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 14, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

В Беларуси пока что все идет по российскому сценарию

  • Olexiy Haran
  • August 12, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Опасная игра Лукашенко

  • Pavel Baev
  • August 11, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть справилась

  • Sergei Medvedev
  • August 10, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Непереломный момент: Смена Конституции

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 6, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Кейс Фургала и три мифа режима

  • Kirill Rogov
  • August 5, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.