PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Russia at War and the Islamic World

    View
  • Ukraine’s Ripple Effect on Russia’s Indo-Pacific Horizon

    View
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Sports and Olympian Politics

  • August 6, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

Perhaps, the most striking paradox of the London Olympic Games is that in spite of the much-discussed commercialization they leave much space for politics. For Britain, the Games bear political connotations due to subtle allusions of its imperial legacy of which sports and the English language are a core component. “Most countries will play British sports or sports that were derived from British sports,” a journalist from The New York Times opined. The Britons themselves make political conclusions from comparing the 2012 Olympics with the Games of 1948 held in London – widely known as the “post-war austerity games.” Today, the British government is proud of being able to spend huge amounts of money on sports. This leads London to a political (and public relations) conclusion that in spite of the EU financial crisis, the British economy is investment-friendly and has good financial prospects for the years to come – though the lasting effects of London’s spending will remain an outstanding matter of domestic political contestation.

Skeptical voices abound: “at times of political or economic crisis, the British have always turned to spectacles,” a commentator in the International Herald Tribune ironically remarked. In fact, the political linkage between success in sports and the strength of national identity is widely articulated globally. Comparisons of London with Beijing, where the previous summer Olympics took place with tons of Chinese grandeur, only underpin political tones in the global Olympic discourse. Or take, for example, the words of Ana Palacio, the former Spanish foreign minister:

“The Spanish victories in the World and European football championships were not incidental… They demonstrate how awarding can be skills implemented through identification with a common goal” (Die Welt, July 27).

As in the case of Britain, sport success is directly associated with national identity and the ability to achieve desired results internationally. The London Olympiad is the first in history when each of the 205 National Olympic Committees has sent male and female athletes, and the leading sports nation – the United States – has more women than men. The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung has called the 2012 Games “Die Frauen-Show.” This definitely sets a political milestone for the future. Then, a number of less expected occurrences came to the fore.

The media widely commented on U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s mild criticism of the way the organizers tackled the whole gamut of security issues surrounding the Games. And an incident with the South Korean flag mistakenly displayed at the pre-game presentation of the North Korean football team added some pepper to the mixture of sports and politics. In fact, this Korean episode clearly illustrates how sensitive national sport identities might be. Ukrainian and Georgian Foreign Ministries, for example, protested against the mishandling of their athletes’ data: the country of birth of some of them were indicated as Russia, even though they were born in Ukraine or Abkhazia.

Yet the politicization of the Games reached its peak (so far) in debates about the attendance of some political figures: Alexander Lukashenko, who is the President not only of Belarus, but also of his country’s Olympic Committee, had to stay home since he is banned from traveling to the EU, along with some other dictators like Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. Lukashenko responded to the travel prohibition by accusing the organizers of the Games as “tainting the Olympiad with politicization” and by reiterating his old mantra that “Belarus remains an island of free thinking and independence” in Europe. This funny reaction changed nothing in the visa policy of the UK government who, as a journalist from Berliner Zeitung assumed, intended to turn the Olympic Games into a dictator-free-zone. Yet this did not apply to such personalities as Islam Karimov from Uzbekistan or Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov from Turkmenistan, who were ranked by Human Rights Watch as in the company of the worst dictators of the world.

As for the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, he declined to attend the opening ceremony but showed up at a judo competition. I will leave to conspirologists to judge whether Putin’s move reflects his tacit confirmation of the crisis in Russian–British relations. At any rate, Putin’s selective participation in Olympic diplomacy in London seems a bit strange for the chief executive of a country that, in two years, will host the next Games – the Winter Olympics in Sochi. Hopefully he understands the challenges that Russia faces in the preparation for the 2014 Olympiad: the whole world will scrutinize how effective the Russian government can be in tackling security challenges that are rampant across the North Caucasus, and how responsive the Russian government is to the environmental and cultural demands of local communities residing in this region. Of course, the most controversial leaders of neighboring countries, like Alexander Lukashenko and Viktor Yanukovich, will be among the most-welcomed guests at the Sochi Games. But if Russia wishes to use the Olympics to raise its international profile, it needs a different type of openness.

As my colleague Mikhail Alexseev suggested a year ago at a PONARS Eurasia conference, it is hypothetic, but not unthinkable, that the Sochi Olympiad will form an appropriate climate for making substantial political moves, like Russia’s conciliation with Georgia, or forging common Russia–EU policies toward Abkhazia and South Ossetia. I would add a number of other possible bold moves to this list, including pooling Russia’s and NATO’s resources in the Black Sea for preventing terrorist acts and the temporary suspension of visa requirements for travelers holding Olympic tickets. Each of these steps would certainly demonstrate the most positive meaning of politicization within the Olympic context.

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • Alexseev
  • Makarychev
  • Olympics
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Solving the Transnistrian Impasse

  • August 1, 2012
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

PONARS Eurasia Members In the News

  • August 8, 2012
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.