PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
Contacts
Address 1957 E St NW, Washington, DC 20052 adminponars@gwu.edu 202.994.5915
NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Preparing for the Parliamentary Elections of 2021: Russian Politics and Society (Gel’man, Lankina, Semenov, Smyth, and more)

    View
  • Russians supported Putin’s moves in Crimea in 2014. Here’s what’s different in 2021

    View
  • Putin’s Rules of the Game: The Pitfalls of Russia’s New Constitution

    View
  • In the Caucasus, There Is a Peace Agreement but Not Peace

    View
  • Russia’s Niche Soft Power: Sources, Targets and Channels of Influence

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • Music and Politics in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2021] April 12, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Gorbachev about the dynamic music scene in contemporary Russia, and how free Russian musicians are to make political statements.
  • How is the Russian Government Coping with Rising Food Prices? [Lipman Series 2021] March 15, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Anton Tabakh about rising food prices in Russia, and what they might mean for Russia's current and future stability.
  • The Communist Party of the Russian Federation: More Than Just Systemic Opposition? [Lipman Series 2021] March 5, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Felix Light and Nikolay Petrov about the contemporary Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including the divisions between its leadership and membership, its attitude toward Alexei Navalny, and why it might be more than just "systemic" opposition after all.
  • Internet Resources: Civic Communication and State Surveillance [Lipman Series 2021] February 16, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Andrei Soldatov and Tanya Lokot about the role of the internet in contemporary Russian politics, including both as a tool of the Russian opposition and as an instrument of the increasingly repressive Russian regime.
  • The Rise of Alexei Navalny's Political Stature and Mass Protest in Russia [Lipman Series 2021] February 1, 2021
    In the first PONARS Eurasia Podcast of 2021, Maria Lipman chats with Greg Yudin about the current protests taking place in Russia, and what Alexei Navalny's growing popular support means for the Putin regime.
  • Russian Social Policy in the COVID-19 Era [Lipman Series 2020] December 21, 2020
    In 2020’s final episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sarah Wilson Sokhey and Ella Paneyakh to discuss Russian social policy in the COVID-19 era, and public perception of Russia’s overall pandemic response.
  • Conscious Parenting Practices in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2020] December 10, 2020
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Julia Yuzbasheva and Maria Danilova to learn more about the proliferation of "conscious parenting" practices in contemporary Russian society.
  • The Transformation of Belarussian Society [Lipman Series 2020] November 11, 2020
    In this episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Masha Lipman chats with Grigory Ioffe about the long-term and short-term factors that led up to the current protests in Belarus, and the ongoing transformation of Belarussian society.
  • Russian Lawmakers Adjust National Legislation to the Revised Constitutional Framework [Lipman Series 2020] October 26, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about ongoing changes to Russia’s national legislation based on the recently revised constitutional framework, and what these changes portend for the 2021 Duma election.
  • Russia's Regional Elections [Lipman Series 2020] September 25, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Graeme Robertson and Konstantin Gaaze about Russia’s September 13 regional elections and whether or not the Kremlin should be worried about upcoming Duma elections.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Sports and Olympian Politics

  • August 6, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

Perhaps, the most striking paradox of the London Olympic Games is that in spite of the much-discussed commercialization they leave much space for politics. For Britain, the Games bear political connotations due to subtle allusions of its imperial legacy of which sports and the English language are a core component. “Most countries will play British sports or sports that were derived from British sports,” a journalist from The New York Times opined. The Britons themselves make political conclusions from comparing the 2012 Olympics with the Games of 1948 held in London – widely known as the “post-war austerity games.” Today, the British government is proud of being able to spend huge amounts of money on sports. This leads London to a political (and public relations) conclusion that in spite of the EU financial crisis, the British economy is investment-friendly and has good financial prospects for the years to come – though the lasting effects of London’s spending will remain an outstanding matter of domestic political contestation.

Skeptical voices abound: “at times of political or economic crisis, the British have always turned to spectacles,” a commentator in the International Herald Tribune ironically remarked. In fact, the political linkage between success in sports and the strength of national identity is widely articulated globally. Comparisons of London with Beijing, where the previous summer Olympics took place with tons of Chinese grandeur, only underpin political tones in the global Olympic discourse. Or take, for example, the words of Ana Palacio, the former Spanish foreign minister:

“The Spanish victories in the World and European football championships were not incidental… They demonstrate how awarding can be skills implemented through identification with a common goal” (Die Welt, July 27).

As in the case of Britain, sport success is directly associated with national identity and the ability to achieve desired results internationally. The London Olympiad is the first in history when each of the 205 National Olympic Committees has sent male and female athletes, and the leading sports nation – the United States – has more women than men. The Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung has called the 2012 Games “Die Frauen-Show.” This definitely sets a political milestone for the future. Then, a number of less expected occurrences came to the fore.

The media widely commented on U.S. presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s mild criticism of the way the organizers tackled the whole gamut of security issues surrounding the Games. And an incident with the South Korean flag mistakenly displayed at the pre-game presentation of the North Korean football team added some pepper to the mixture of sports and politics. In fact, this Korean episode clearly illustrates how sensitive national sport identities might be. Ukrainian and Georgian Foreign Ministries, for example, protested against the mishandling of their athletes’ data: the country of birth of some of them were indicated as Russia, even though they were born in Ukraine or Abkhazia.

Yet the politicization of the Games reached its peak (so far) in debates about the attendance of some political figures: Alexander Lukashenko, who is the President not only of Belarus, but also of his country’s Olympic Committee, had to stay home since he is banned from traveling to the EU, along with some other dictators like Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe. Lukashenko responded to the travel prohibition by accusing the organizers of the Games as “tainting the Olympiad with politicization” and by reiterating his old mantra that “Belarus remains an island of free thinking and independence” in Europe. This funny reaction changed nothing in the visa policy of the UK government who, as a journalist from Berliner Zeitung assumed, intended to turn the Olympic Games into a dictator-free-zone. Yet this did not apply to such personalities as Islam Karimov from Uzbekistan or Gurbanguly Berdymukhamedov from Turkmenistan, who were ranked by Human Rights Watch as in the company of the worst dictators of the world.

As for the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, he declined to attend the opening ceremony but showed up at a judo competition. I will leave to conspirologists to judge whether Putin’s move reflects his tacit confirmation of the crisis in Russian–British relations. At any rate, Putin’s selective participation in Olympic diplomacy in London seems a bit strange for the chief executive of a country that, in two years, will host the next Games – the Winter Olympics in Sochi. Hopefully he understands the challenges that Russia faces in the preparation for the 2014 Olympiad: the whole world will scrutinize how effective the Russian government can be in tackling security challenges that are rampant across the North Caucasus, and how responsive the Russian government is to the environmental and cultural demands of local communities residing in this region. Of course, the most controversial leaders of neighboring countries, like Alexander Lukashenko and Viktor Yanukovich, will be among the most-welcomed guests at the Sochi Games. But if Russia wishes to use the Olympics to raise its international profile, it needs a different type of openness.

As my colleague Mikhail Alexseev suggested a year ago at a PONARS Eurasia conference, it is hypothetic, but not unthinkable, that the Sochi Olympiad will form an appropriate climate for making substantial political moves, like Russia’s conciliation with Georgia, or forging common Russia–EU policies toward Abkhazia and South Ossetia. I would add a number of other possible bold moves to this list, including pooling Russia’s and NATO’s resources in the Black Sea for preventing terrorist acts and the temporary suspension of visa requirements for travelers holding Olympic tickets. Each of these steps would certainly demonstrate the most positive meaning of politicization within the Olympic context.

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Andrey Makarychev
Andrey Makarychev
Website | + posts
Visiting Professor

Affiliation

Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, University of Tartu, Estonia

Links

University of Tartu (Bio)

Expertise

Russian Foreign and Security Policies, EU-Russian Relations, Foreign Policy Discourses, Regionalism and Federalism
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    The Minsk–Khabarovsk nexus: Ethical, performative, corporeal
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    Twigg: I worry about whether or not people are going to be willing to take Sputnik V in Russia
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    Culture as an Instrument
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    The Coronavirus and the Future of Liberalism
Related Topics
  • Alexseev
  • Makarychev
  • Olympics
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Solving the Transnistrian Impasse

  • August 1, 2012
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

PONARS Eurasia Members In the News

  • August 8, 2012
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 22, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Авторитарные режимы не вечны: О ситуации в Белоруссии

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 14, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

В Беларуси пока что все идет по российскому сценарию

  • Olexiy Haran
  • August 12, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Опасная игра Лукашенко

  • Pavel Baev
  • August 11, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть справилась

  • Sergei Medvedev
  • August 10, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Непереломный момент: Смена Конституции

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 6, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Кейс Фургала и три мифа режима

  • Kirill Rogov
  • August 5, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.