PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Talking about Talking: A Socio-Linguistic Look at Russia and its Neighbors

  • August 24, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

For socio-linguists everything matters – private ads hanging on the fences, street signs, media commercials, election posters, and even football fans’ exclamations. This made the Socio-Linguistic Symposium “Language and the City” held in Berlin on August 21-24 a fascinating academic event with clear implications for the ways we see ethnicity, culture and identity in different regions of Eurasia.

At huge academic conferences like this you would certainly never meet anyone of a legion of professional defenders of Russian language in what they prefer to label “near abroad.” They are so vociferous within Russia and at multiple Kremlin-sponsored forums, but completely absent from international debates. This testifies to a deep gap between highly politicized Russian discourse on language and world-class scholarly research in this domain. The linguistic landscapes of the world, as seen from academic perspective, drastically differ from oversimplified (mis)perceptions of the Russian officialdom.

Spaces that are hierarchically organized by states, culturally and linguistically are constellations – or – patchworks of multiple identities and social roles. Some of them are situational, others are more engrained in lifestyles and social practices. This is especially true for areas which lie at intersections of different linguistic traditions. Pontian Greeks living in Russia’s south or Ingrian Finns in St.Petersburg area are good examples of ethnic groups that value their European (Greek or Finnish) roots and preserve their double identities. It seems that European researchers are more interested in exploring these cases of Russia’s cultural openness than their Russian colleagues.

As many conference presenters claimed, different language strategies can be effects of groups’ interests or their identities. An interesting case is Nagorno-Karabakh: the de-facto status of Russian as the second language here is more a matter of pragmatic consideration than a gesture of cultural identification with Russia (and its policies).

Globalization might be in relative harmony with local discourses, or may stay in conflict. For example, grass-roots communities in some Russian cities preparing for hosting world-scope mega-events (Universiade-2013 in Kazan or Winter Olympic Games in Sochi in 2014) are critical about their negative impacts on historical downtowns and vernacular architectural traditions.

Language therefore is a self-sufficient and constantly changing system of social meanings, and not a political tool in states’ possession. Some political groups are of course eager to instrumentalize language and turn it into a soft power instrument. A Ukrainian colleague from Vinnitsa added a post-colonial flavor to discussion by referring to three centuries of Russia’s domination in Ukraine and imposition of the metropole’s language on this country. But does it mean that President Yanukovich who spearheaded a campaign for elevating the status of Russian as the second language in Ukraine, can be viewed as an agent of former colonial power. The answer was complicated: in his opinion, the new legislation on Russian language seems to be rather an additional resource in his complex power bargaining with Russia, and a means for extracting new – and mostly material – concessions from Moscow obsessed with reintegrating Slavic nations and the idea of the “Russian world.”

Russia does have certain linguistic influences in many neighboring countries, but this does not necessarily work for the Kremlin’s benefit. For example, according to a research in the city of Vinnitsa, it is in social networks where Ukrainians most often use Russian language: 75% of respondents are constant users of Russian internet resources, as compared with only 35% of Russian periodical readership, or 52% of Russian TV viewership. These figures can be interpreted from a political viewpoint: it is the Runet-based new social media where the bulk of protest discourse is assembled, and it is this discourse that is in huge demand beyond Russia. Speaking Russian and being loyal to Putin appear to be two different things.

Besides, there are demographic changes that work against the predominance of the Russian language in neighboring countries. Kazakhstan is a good case in point – Kazakh language is increasingly used in education and administration.

Moscow’s approach to its linguistic policy towards its neighbors, embedded in the “Russian world” concept, is deficient in one important sense: it proceeds from a false assumption that a global community of Russian-speakers does already exists, Russia inherited it from the old times, and all that is needed is to spend money on the needy “compatriots living abroad” ( library books, travel grants, etc.). If Russia is serious about instrumentalizing its soft power, it needs a much more sophisticated agenda. It has to construct the trans-national community of Russian-speakers, to nourish it with socially and culturally appealing meanings, and start a genuinely inter-subjective dialogue with this community. Yet alas this agenda seems to be way beyond the technocratic logic of the Kremlin.

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • Makarychev
  • Russia
  • Sochi Olympics
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Visual Representations, Pussy Riot, and Putin’s Hatred for Politics

  • August 22, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Op-Ed: After Afghanistan, a New Great Game

  • August 24, 2012
  • Alexander Cooley
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.