PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

    View
  • Russia at War and the Islamic World

    View
  • Ukraine’s Ripple Effect on Russia’s Indo-Pacific Horizon

    View
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

The Russian Version of Euro-Skepticism

  • April 30, 2013
  • Andrey Makarychev

Regretfully, anti-European rhetoric in Russia is on the rise. The Russia Today TV Channel (“RT”) readily covers the most Euro-skeptic parties all across Europe. Pseudo-scholars like Alexander Dugin contemplate Russia's chances to subsume the crisis-ridden Europe. Fiodor Lukianov, a pro-Kremlin journalist and the head of the Council for Foreign and Defense Policy, referring to the reelection of an elderly Italian President, mocks European politics for its alleged inability to give floor to a new generation of young politicians. The Valdai Club engages in a more sophisticated discourse, misrepresenting the pro-European sentiments in Russia as liberal (one of the most negatively marked words in the vocabulary of the Putin regime), and then ritually asking a question of whether a European choice exists at all. Newspaper titles like "We are not Europeans? Thank goodness!" seem to nicely reflect a Kremlin-fostered mood in Russia. Against this background, it is only logical that Russia and the EU failed to talk business in the Cyprus financial crisis.

The Russian version of Euro-skepticism is an interesting phenomenon since it develops in a country with neither intentions nor chances to join the EU. Thus, unlike similar platforms within the EU, the Russian anti-European discourse is much more political than economically based. In previous years, the Kremlin was trying to play a more sophisticated language-game of formally accepting the key European normative signifiers (democracy, human rights, etc.) yet simultaneously infusing their own (sometimes implicitly non-European) meanings in them. Nowadays, the strategy is simplified, and a less nuanced and more clearly articulated anti-European narrative.

Moscow lambasts the EU—and the West in general—to English-speaking audiences, with RT targeting not Russia's near abroad but viewers in the West. RT analysts Andranik Migranian and Natalia Narochnitskaya promote the Kremlin version of democracy as heads of the Institute for Development and Cooperation not in Kyiv or Yerevan, but in New York and Paris.

But Moscow is not fully sincere in celebrating Europe's downfall. Is Europe indeed as weak and unattractive as many in Moscow try to depict it? Don't we need a more politically neutral and balanced "optics" to view Europe in all its diversity? It is exactly these questions that were discussed a few days ago quite far from the Russian capital, in the city of Tyumen, which hosted a workshop on "Russia and Germany in the Common Communicative Space.” Nota bene: the school was completely funded from Russian sources, which didn't make it less critical of Russian policies toward major European countries. Several dozen future specialists in international relations, regional studies, and political analysis apparently chose to treat Europe as an instructive object of research, even a riddle that makes us rebut simplified black-and-white interpretations of the world we live in. Even in crisis, the EU keeps expanding (Croatia is about to become another member state) and remains a magnet for sizeable constituencies in countries like Ukraine, Moldova, and Georgia. Within the EU, the relatively old regional groupings like the Weimar triangle and the Visegrad Four demonstrate a high degree of resilience and sustainability—something that is almost completely missing in the post-Soviet area.   

Domestically, the European political community is busy with a very substantial and rich-in-meaning debate between proponents of a federalist future for the Union and those who favor a looser model of inter-governmental association. Nothing like this exists in Russia, which does not seem to care about sustaining its mostly rhetorical claims to play a pivotal role in the Eurasian Union project. 

Internationally, EU diplomacy has achieved a successful breakthrough in mediating a rapprochement between Serbia and Kosovo. This is an important event, especially against the background of dominating skepticism about the possibilities of major powers to find solutions for break-away territories and the countries from which they have seceded. Russia, vociferously proclaiming itself the leader in post-Soviet Eurasia, lacks a successful record of conflict resolution. Perhaps, the new EU experience can be demanded in the frozen conflicts within the common EU-Russia neighborhood.

Of course, the Russian Foreign Ministry can—and most likely will—keep publishing its reports on human rights violations all across Europe. Of course, RT can keep continuing the unfinished Soviet job of revealing all the imperfections of Western democracies. Beyond Russia, this discourse is doomed to remain deeply reactive and repetitive. What is even worse, it will hardly get strong domestic resonance among the young generation of urban professionals. At least, even in Siberia, Europe is a fascinating object to study and learn from.

Andrey Makarychev is a Professor at the Institute of Government and Politics, University of Tartu, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Related Topics
  • Makarychev
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

New Policy Memo: Not Everything Is Wrong with Russia’s Syria Strategy

  • April 26, 2013
  • Pavel Baev
View
Next Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Вступит ли Украина в Евразийский Таможенный Союз?

  • April 30, 2013
  • Olexiy Haran
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

  • Irina Busygina
  • February 8, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.