PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Determinants of Assistance to Ukrainian and Syrian Refugees | New Voices on Eurasia with Volha Charnysh (Feb. 16)

    View
  • Conflicts in the North Caucasus Since 1991 | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy

    View
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Belarus: Back to Basics

  • December 21, 2010
  • PONARS Eurasia

 

by Vitali Silitski Belarusian Institute for Strategic Studies The Belarus presidential election developed under a carnival atmosphere—the major news of the campaign was a kitten brutally murdered by a candidate about sixty years ago—and yet, the show ended in a tragic blood bash. Pressured by Russia and anxious to normalize relations with the EU, President Alexander Lukashenka allowed an unprecedented degree of freedom for the opposition to register (10 candidates ran for election), campaign, deliver messages on television, debate, and criticize. At stake was over $3 billion in technical assistance promised by the EU if the vote was clean. We saw Lukashenka on TV promising the cleanest vote and offering the German foreign minister to stay and count votes if he wished. What we could not see, however, was how much physical and mental discomfort this freedom game cost Lukashenka. The violent crackdown…[continued below]


Recommendations for the EU:

  1. Declare all those arrested on December 19 political prisoners and call for their immediate release.
  2. Suggest a “zero solution” to Lukashenka: declare a readiness to resume political dialogue and follow all other formal and informal agreements contingent upon the release of all prisoners and the abstention of the government from new repressive acts against individuals, parties, NGOs, and media for a period of no less than three months.
  3. Demand an independent, international investigation of the December 19 events.
  4. Declare solidarity and offer help to those who suffered from beatings, arrests, and other repressive acts, and to their families.


The violent crackdown on the post-election protesters in Minsk on December 19, 2010, came as a symbolic “closing” of liberalization that Belarus enjoyed since 2008. Independent accounts provide sufficient information that the violence used by the riot police—arresting and beating hundreds of people—was orchestrated by the security forces. Lukashenka publicly declared his responsibility for treating protesters in a brutal manner and declared the end of “senseless democracy,” conspicuously showing his indifference to “your European structures” on Euronews. Lukashenka’s actions were a choice, not necessity. The regime decided to undo the results of the lengthy and elaborate “façade of democratization” it had built over the preceding several months, even as an “elegant victory” with minimal violence and only modest election rigging—enough for the EU to call it significant political progress and to boost a dialogue—was at hand minutes before polls closed and people began assembling on the streets. The exit polls sponsored by the authorities announced 72% voted for Lukashenka—a number the EU could easily swallow. But the regime obviously failed to withstand the challenge of its own liberalization efforts as it came to understand that sustaining a relatively free society would bring forth the loss of political control much sooner than either the regime or observers could have expected. All of a sudden, society woke up and many began to be politically active. Electoral commissions “misread,” in Lukashenka’s word, his policies, and were too afraid to rig the votes. And police argued with riot police on the streets over whether to crack down on the protesters. Facing small but remarkable signs of disorder in the repressive apparatus, he consciously chose repressive stability over whatever benefits liberalization and openness to Europe could bring. Judging by the actions, it can be firmly concluded that the crackdown was planned well in advance and was not a spontaneous decision. For three years, the EU and civil society in Belarus tried to “drag” Lukashenka into the European orbit, hoping that closer ties to the EU would encourage internal liberalization and reform in the country. The events on December 19 and the forthcoming all-around crackdown proved that Lukashenka’s regime is not reformable by evolutionary means and can briefly only mimic a semblance of evolution. This brings Belarus back to the situation of 2005-2006, perhaps with much less hope for dialogue and engagement in hand. We need to reflect deeper on the long-term consequences and possible actions of what has happened, and also concentrate on minimizing the damage to Belarus in its slide back to its darkest day of repression. To do so, we suggest that the European Union take the following actions:

  1. Declare all those arrested on December 19 political prisoners and call for their immediate release.
  2. Suggest a “zero solution” to Lukashenka: declare a readiness to resume political dialogue and follow all other formal and informal agreements contingent upon the release of all prisoners and the abstention of the government from new repressive acts against individuals, parties, NGOs, and media for a period of no less than three months.
  3. Demand an independent, international investigation of the December 19 events.
  4. Declare solidarity and offer help to those who suffered from beatings, arrests, and other repressive acts, and to their families.

Secondary Author:
Vitali Silitski
Related Topics
  • Belarus
  • Elections
  • Silitski
Previous Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Belarus Elections – December 2010

  • December 21, 2010
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Manas Revisited

  • January 10, 2011
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.