PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
    • Ukraine Experts
    • About Membership
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
    • Ukraine Experts
    • About Membership
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Illiberalism and Public Opinion Junctures in Russia’s War on Ukraine

    View
  • Policy Exchange Discussion & Memos: Guaranteeing Ukraine’s Long-Run Security (June 9)

    View
  • Ukraine’s Best Chance for Peace

    View
  • We want the war to end. But should calls for negotiating with Putin be taken seriously?

    View
  • Policy Briefs | BEAR Network-PONARS Eurasia Conference

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Is Putin Winning the Recognition Game? Is the Eurasian Union Back on the Table?

  • February 12, 2015
  • PONARS Eurasia

(Guest post by A. Kazharski) Russia's project of Eurasian integration has been very dear to President Vladimir Putin, but it was never recognized by his Western colleagues. Is the war in Ukraine meant to change that?

Last month, Chancellor Angela Merkel suggested that in exchange for a solution to the Ukrainian crisis, trade talks could begin between the EU and the nascent Eurasian Economic Union (EEU).[1] For anyone who has followed the Western discourse about Eurasian integration, these words sound very different from what the West was saying only a few years ago. This may suggest that some Western elites are moving closer toward recognizing the EEU, a political gesture, which if it happens, will have serious symbolic repercussions.

Swedish political scientist Erik Ringmar, described the relationship between Russia and Europe as a “recognition game,” whereby the basic need of gaining status through acceptance as an equal by European counterparts was more important to Russian rulers than any immediate material interests. This, as Ringmar argued, led Stalin to ultimately side with Hitler – Russia needed to find “recognition” elsewhere after it was snubbed by Britain and France in 1939.

The 2011 announcement of the EEU by Putin had all the symptoms of a claim for recognition. The intended isomorphism of Eurasian economic institutions with European integration rhymed rather ill with the economic and political realities of the post-Soviet space. But it revealed a zeal to prove that Russia could be no worse than its significant other (Europe), and that it is capable of building its own version of the EU. This was something that Russian politicians declared on many occasions. If only Europe confirmed.

The problem was that Europe was reluctant to grant recognition. There was no intention to institutionalize direct ties between the EU and the new Eurasian institutions – as Putin and others publicly urged. In fact, there has been a pattern in which post-Soviet regional organizations like the CIS and the CSTO would repeatedly seek interregional, bloc-to-bloc cooperation with the West, whereas officials in NATO and the EU preferred to deal with each post-Soviet country individually.

Many Western experts have warned against recognizing the EEU as it would weaken the EU's conditionality instruments and give the authoritarian Eurasian regimes additional political clout.[2] EU officials pretended in public that Eurasian integration did not exist. In private, they admitted that they did not see much sense in cooperating with the EEU because they believed it was not an economic but a political project. And legally, there was no way Eurasian integration could fit into the rigid, non-negotiable framework of the Eastern Partnership, which was designed by “Eurocrats” for post-Soviet states.

In short, Europe refused to grant Russia recognition on the grounds it sought – the Eurasian Union did not merit acceptance as the EU's alter ego. In recent years, the two post-Soviet regionalist projects, the EEU and the EU's Eastern Partnership, clashed in their shared neighborhood. Thus Russia had started to play its “security” trump cards, first in Armenia and then on a truly drastic scale in Ukraine.[3]

These trump cards seem to have eroded some attitudes in Europe. The first considerations of cooperating with the EEU surfaced in the expert community early in 2014, when Ukraine began to plunge into crisis. By 2015, Europeans were so concerned with a war at their doorsteps they apparently started to view the EEU, imperfect as it was, as a lesser evil compared to the horrors of the so-called Russian world movement (Russki mir), particularly the idea of Russia's “responsibility to protect” compatriots and Russian-speakers regardless of international borders.

Merkel's ideas about the EEU were voiced at least for the second time since November, when Frank-Walter Steinmeier, German foreign minister, went to Moscow with “suggestions” that apparently included initiating direct talks between the two blocs.[4] Recent debate by experts has been on this topic. For example, Ivan Krastev and Mark Leonard, members of the European Council on Foreign Relations, point to the “paradox of the current situation” when the best hope for the EU to work with Russia is through “engagement” with the Eurasian Economic Union.[5]

It remains to be seen if such a policy track is followed, but it is clear that we are seeing another round of the recognition game between Russia and Europe. It makes us ask, how much of the war in Ukraine is a means to fulfill the EEU recognition claim? It seems that the approach developed by Ringmar and other scholars of “identity” remains highly relevant.

Still, for politicians and policy experts, the current million-dollar question is whether recognizing the EEU will help at this stage. Can the approach stop the massacres in Ukraine, will it mean a Russian EEU delegate will have a seat in Brussels, then so be it. The downside is that it could reinforce a nasty conviction: it is easier for Russia to destabilize its neighbors than attract them. The message may be that instead of proper institution- building, Russia can simply gain European recognition by jeopardizing everyone's security. Converting military power into symbolic status could become a habit not easily broken.

Aliaksei Kazharski is a PhD candidate at the Institute of European Studies and International Relations, Comenius University in Bratislava, Slovakia. PONARS Eurasia member Andrey Makarychev facilitated this submission. 


[1] http://www.dw.de/merkel-and-gabriel-offer-russia-free-trade-agreement/a-18211951

[2] http://www.eesc.lt/uploads/news/id459/Eurasian%20Union-a%20Challenge%20for%20the%20European%20Union%20and%20Eastern%20Partnership%20Countries.pdf

[3] http://www.wilsoncenter.org/article/russia%E2%80%99s-ukrainian-dilemmas

[4] http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/93e5e066-757a-11e4-b1bf-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3RLCluxnV

[5] http://www.ecfr.eu/page/-/ECFR117_TheNewEuropeanDisorder_ESSAY.pdf

 

 

PONARS Eurasia
+ posts
  • PONARS Eurasia
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/ponars-eurasia/
    Policy Exchange Discussion & Memos: Guaranteeing Ukraine's Long-Run Security (June 9)
  • PONARS Eurasia
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/ponars-eurasia/
    Policy Briefs | BEAR Network-PONARS Eurasia Conference
  • PONARS Eurasia
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/ponars-eurasia/
    The Collapse of the Soviet Union | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy
  • PONARS Eurasia
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/ponars-eurasia/
    Labor Migration in Russia | PONARS Eurasia Online Academy
Related Topics
  • EU
  • Eurasian Union
  • Russia
  • Ukraine
Previous Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Baev: Russian Arctic threat to Norway is already to a certain degree real

  • February 12, 2015
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
Next Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Two Guys Discussing Russia: Could there be a Maidan in Moscow?

  • February 12, 2015
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 22, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Авторитарные режимы не вечны: О ситуации в Белоруссии

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 14, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

В Беларуси пока что все идет по российскому сценарию

  • Olexiy Haran
  • August 12, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Опасная игра Лукашенко

  • Pavel Baev
  • August 11, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть справилась

  • Sergei Medvedev
  • August 10, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.