PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • Membership | Core
      • Membership | Collegium
      • Membership | Associates
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • Membership | Core
      • Membership | Collegium
      • Membership | Associates
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Will Ukraine Wind Up Making Territorial Concessions to Russia? Foreign Affairs Asks the Experts

    View
  • Pro-Kremlin Propaganda’s Failure in Ukraine | New Voices on Eurasia with Aaron Erlich (Jan. 19)

    View
  • Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

    View
  • Russia’s war in Ukraine threatens students daily and forces teachers to improvise

    View
  • Prevailing Soviet Legacies

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Merkel’s Agenda in Moldova: Federalization? Europeanization?

  • July 12, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

Guest post by Andrey Devyatkov—European interest in Moldova’s future recently received new momentum due to the forthcoming visit of German Chancellor Angela Merkel to Chisinau. Some analysts assume that Germany is going to enhance its activities in Moldova to support Moldova’s “success story” of reforms and consequently shape its gradual integration into the EU. But most analysts see Germany’s interest as an attempt to find a bilateral (Russian-German) solution for the Transnistrian issue (to be legitimized multilaterally post-factum).

We should be reminded that in June 2010, Merkel and former Russian President Dmitry Medvedev agreed on the Meseberg Memorandum, which made the Transnistrian conflict a test-case in Russian-EU relations. Arguably, this new wave of the German interest in Moldova can be viewed within this context. Most viewpoints are based on the presumption that Germany has a very clear strategy on Moldova. But in fact, Merkel’s visit seems to be more of a feeler than an occasion to propose a well-thought-out plan for Moldova.

To me, both the European integration of Moldova and the settlement of the Transnistrian issue in the framework of Russian-EU relations will most probably become key issues for negotiations between Moldovan Prime Minister Vlad Filat and Merkel. These are not controversial agendas for Berlin. Moldova is now taking its first serious steps on the way toward European integration.

On June 26, the Air Services Agreement between the EU and Moldova was signed to create a common market in aviation. Visa liberalization and a “Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area” are being discussed. But there is still a hard choice: should the EU repeat the Cyprus experience with Moldova (in terms of integrating a de facto failed state with an unresolved internal conflict), or should the restoration of Moldovan territorial integrity be a prerequisite for its European integration. Germany is obviously favoring the second variant. There are various causes for this:

First, the option of protracting the frozen conflict in the nearest of European neighborhoods is not acceptable to Berlin. It contradicts the stabilization agenda for the European Neighborhood Policy. Second, Germany sees the question of Moldova’s future in the context of EU-Russian relations. Germany still wishes to support the Meseberg process and, more generally, to find a way toward EU-Russian rapprochement. In the absence of a strongly coordinated EU foreign policy, particularly in the Eastern neighborhood, Berlin is taking over a coordination role that it tries to legitimize through various formats.

Berlin maintains a dialogue with Romania that has strong instruments of influence over Chisinau. In the last three years, meetings of Moldovan and Transnistrian leaders took place in Germany under the aegis of the OSCE. Merkel’s expected visit to Moldova is understandable in this context: Berlin is determined to speak with the Moldovan government on its strategy for European integration and the Transnistrian issue. Besides, the German government has already understood that the Transnistrian conflict is not an issue that can be solved easily and quickly. But because of some recent progress in Moldovan-Transnistrian relations, there is some relative optimism that the Meseberg initiative can be revived. Tiraspol and Chisinau have already agreed on resuming rail services and are very active in negotiating other measures of cooperation in infrastructure, social policy, etc.

The pragmatic discourses of the new Transnistrian leader and Moldovan prime-minister are perceived as a basis for finding good pay-offs not only in technicalities but also in political issues. After the failure of the Kozak Memorandum in 2003, which was proposed by Moscow in order to strengthen its role in the Transnistrian settlement, the term “federalization” in the Moldovan context became a bogey. Federalization of Moldova was equated to the “Transnistrization” of Moldova, and it was held closely in case Transnistria received too much power in a reunified state. Merkel’s visit to Moldova can be interpreted within this context. This interpretation is used by some mass-media outlets and institutions, such as Stratfor, a U.S.-based think tank, which issued scandalous assessments about Germany’s alleged “betrayal of Western interests.”

Political circles in the region that do not favor any changes in the status quo also contribute to the negative atmosphere around German activities. One cannot expect too much from Merkel’s visit to Chisinau, but the stable engagement of Germany, despite the current financial crisis and political turmoil in the EU, should be praised. In fact, “European” and “Russian” vectors for Moldova can be combined, and the option of finding a common EU-Russian approach toward Moldova’s future is also in the Moldovan interest. Germany is strongly embedded in European and Euro-Atlantic institutions, and stories about a Russian-German “secret deal” on Moldova are a gross distortion, sometimes intentional and sometimes inadvertent.

Andrey Devyatkov is a Visiting Fellow, New Europe College, Bucharest

Related Topics
  • Devyatkov
  • Makarychev
  • Moldova
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Is Russia Disappointed with Western Theories?

  • July 11, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

East Europe Orientation Pause Opens Fortochkas* for the United States

  • July 19, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gel'man
  • August 22, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.