PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
    • Ukraine Experts
    • About Membership
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
    • Ukraine Experts
    • About Membership
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Illiberalism and Public Opinion Junctures in Russia’s War on Ukraine

    View
  • Policy Exchange Discussion & Memos: Guaranteeing Ukraine’s Long-Run Security (June 9)

    View
  • Ukraine’s Best Chance for Peace

    View
  • We want the war to end. But should calls for negotiating with Putin be taken seriously?

    View
  • Policy Briefs | BEAR Network-PONARS Eurasia Conference

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

President Trump’s Warsaw Speech: A Window into a Trump Doctrine?

  • August 7, 2017
  • Volodymyr Dubovyk

Donald Trump has been the president of the United States for half a year. Over this time, observers have been trying to see through the cloud of his often controversial and conflicting statements at what might constitute his true vision of international relations. Trump’s recent speech in Warsaw was the best window into his outlook. Although he provided some good answers, the feeling after the speech was that now we have more questions than answers.

Much of the speech was focused, appropriately enough, on Poland and Polish-American relations. The president chose not to address some of the disturbing, obvious, undemocratic trends in Poland. Instead, he appeared rather supportive of the current government’s creeping offensive on civil rights. But this is hardly surprising because Trump probably sees an echo there of his own troubles in dealing with political opponents, courts, and the free media. He probably sees a natural ally in these types of foreign leaderships and it is exactly this sort of solidarity—an international of soft authoritarians—that may be emerging and finding its loudest voice in Washington. This is quite troubling. What exactly is coming out of Washington that replaces the idea of democracy promotion?[1]

One of the most controversial subjects is Trump’s position on NATO. He has called it obsolete and questioned its efficacy. This has placed doubts about America’s commitment to the alliance and its leadership of it. His preferred way of talking about NATO has been to focus on countries which, in his view, have not provided enough funds. However, his talk about European free riders that take U.S. security for granted and do not invest in security capabilities is actually nothing new. The previous U.S. administration mentioned these things on several occasions. However, the manner changed dramatically. Trump’s tone toward NATO has been harmful on many levels. In Warsaw, in a sign of encouragement, the president went beyond his former pronouncements about member states paying dues; he spoke of it as a commitment of will.

“Will” certainly matters. The treaties, agreements, international institutions, and security arrangements involved function via a sea of people, where statements by leaders matter. NATO functionality depends on policies and doctrines, which are based on facts and visions. The president of the alliance’s leading member state carries a lot of weight. Even though Trump said that the transatlantic bond is as strong as ever, it is hard to say if this is indeed true. The primary reason for this is Trump’s personal reluctance to support the institution. His personal outlook affects the state of the alliance.

Trump has been encouraged for months to publicly reassure NATO members that the United States is committed to the principle of collective defense enshrined in Article 5. Others in his administration have confirmed the U.S. commitment, but the president did not until reaching Poland. Pundits have described various vying factions in his administration, which is not unusual in itself, but serious divisions on pivotal strategic issues, such as collective defense and NATO, is something new and consequential. Why did the president delay making a commitment to Article 5? Was he forced to finally to do so? Does the U.S. commitment made in Warsaw reflect Trump’s personal position? Was he sincere in his Warsaw speech? The president is responsible for the many lingering questions. It appears that only through potential U.S. actions will the many questions be put to rest. His belated commitment, and his manner in general toward Russia and NATO, has unsettled many, while, I am afraid to say, at the same time allowing other the chance to test the validity of U.S. global commitments in real life.

Trump spoke about Ukraine and Russia in his Warsaw speech. He urged Russia to cease its destabilizing activities in Ukraine and elsewhere. This was something new because many were waiting for him to clarify his position about Russia’s destabilizing actions in foreign states. As with NATO, Trump had seemingly delegated this domain to others in his administration, but this is not how the world turns—people want to know what the president himself thinks. Unfortunately, unlike some other observers who rushed to praise both Trump’s Article 5 announcement and his mentioning of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, his words in Poland come across as too little, too late, and uncertainty was not erased.

To say that Russia destabilizes Ukraine is saying very little. Russia has been destabilizing Ukraine for many years—some would say since Ukraine’s independence. Russia has used a broad variety of levers (economic, energy, information, political, etc.) to try to control Ukraine for a long time. Since March of 2014, it has waged war on Ukraine. There are quite a few countries that Russia destabilizes, within and beyond the post-Soviet space, but there are not many places where it has troops fighting. There are only a couple of places, namely Ukraine and Syria, where the Moscow leadership is deeply and profoundly involved in ongoing, daily military activities. Though the former U.S. president and members of the current administration have acknowledged Russia’s actions in Ukraine, the current president, even in Warsaw, only made mild statements about “destabilization.”

Perhaps Trump, based on the possible trajectory of his words post-Warsaw, may well find prudence and pace in dealing with (European) geopolitics. But, actions will ultimately speak louder than words, and from this we will better see Washington’s bona fide global outlook.


[1] On the subject of U.S.-Polish relations, there is an aspect that should have been dealt with a long time ago, and Trump should have addressed it: the issue of Poles waiting for U.S. visas.

 

Volodymyr Dubovyk
Website | + posts
Associate Professor, Department of International Relations
Affiliation

Mechnikov National University, Odessa
Links

Mechnikov National University (Bio)
Expertise

Ukraine, Transatlantic Relations, EU
  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/author/volodymyr-dubovyk/
    Ukraine’s Internally Displaced Persons
  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/author/volodymyr-dubovyk/
    Dominating Ukraine’s Sky
  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/author/volodymyr-dubovyk/
    Footing Restored: Nudging Ukraine Forward in the Biden-Zelensky Era
  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/author/volodymyr-dubovyk/
    US-Ukraine rela­tions under Joe Biden: secu­rity and domes­tic reforms as mutu­ally rein­forc­ing pillars
Related Topics
  • Dubovyk
  • EU
  • NATO
  • Poland
  • Russia
  • Syria
  • U.S.-Russian Relations
  • Ukraine
Previous Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Европейская миссия Пенса: вице-президент США едет успокаивать союзников

  • August 7, 2017
  • Mariya Omelicheva
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Позиция Ирана по Карабаху важна для всего Кавказа

  • August 7, 2017
  • Sara Huzar
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 22, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Авторитарные режимы не вечны: О ситуации в Белоруссии

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 14, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

В Беларуси пока что все идет по российскому сценарию

  • Olexiy Haran
  • August 12, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Опасная игра Лукашенко

  • Pavel Baev
  • August 11, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть справилась

  • Sergei Medvedev
  • August 10, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.