PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • A Rock and a Hard Place: The Russian Opposition in a Time of War | New Voices on Eurasia with Jeremy Ladd (April 11)

    View
  • The Russia Program at GW (IERES)

    View
  • The Evolving Concerns of Russians after the Invasion | New Voices on Eurasia with Sasha de Vogel (March 9)

    View
  • PONARS Eurasia Spring Policy Conference (March 3)

    View
  • Ukrainathon 2023 (Feb. 24-25)

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

The Sivas Case and Turkey’s Credibility Problem Regarding Syria

  • March 23, 2012
  • Ayse Zarakol

 

At issue here is the recent decision to dismiss the cases against five defendants in the Sivas Massacre trial because of the statute of limitations, and the AKP government’s reactionto that decision.

Sivas, Turkey, 1993

The Sivas Massacre is one of the most sordid episodes in recent Turkish history. Sivas is a town in Eastern Anatolia with a sizable Alevi population. In 1993, during the Pir Sultan AbdalFestivities organized by the Alevi community, a Sunni mob circled the Madimak hotel where festival participants were staying and set it on fire. Thirty-seven people died, many of them important activists, thinkers and poets in the Alevi cultural community. Others barely escaped with their lives.

Homs, Syria, 2012

One-hundred-ninety people were arrested as a result, and charges were brought against 124. In the first trial in 1994, 85 people were sentenced to prison terms, ranging from two to 15 years. After the first appeal process, a second trial was held in 1997, this time resulting in sentences ranging from capital punishment (changed to life sentences when Turkey abolished the death penalty in 2012) to 15 years for 47 defendants. The recent decision involves five people who remained at large after all this time and therefore had not had their trials concluded. Charges against them are now dismissed. The decision attracted even more outrage from the Alevi community after they heard Prime Minister Erdoğan’s response declaring the outcome a blessing for the nation and the country, and clearly self-identifying with the plight of those in prison and the fugitives, as opposed to those killed in the hotel. Erdoğan later defended his remarks saying that he was trying to be fair to both sides, and that many had been unfairly sentenced.

Erdoğan may be right about possible miscarriages of justice in a case involving so many defendants. It is also difficult to apportion blame fairly in situations of mob violence. However, there is extended video footage of the fire and the mob. I even remember watching the event unfold in real time on TV as a teenager. The idea that no one from the Sunni community of Sivas is to blame and that they all have been unfairly scapegoated is quite preposterous. The fact of the matter is that the larger Sunni Islamist political movement of which Erdoğan is a part of has been very reluctant to confront their own devils, and are instead always content to blame the Turkish “deep state” for committing or instigating atrocities. Even in the Sivas case, they are now hiding behind this claim, arguing that the massacre would never have taken place had the Turkish military stepped in earlier. However true that claim may be, it does not change the fact that a Sunni mob burned down a fully occupied hotel with the intent to murder Alevi intellectuals and cultural leaders. The community has not chastised anyone for their involvement, let alone take ownership of the event. Further, while no community in Turkey has clean hands, where sectarian violence is concerned, Alevis have been on the receiving end far more often (See also Maraş massacre). As a result, they, as a rule, distrust all political movements emerging out of the Sunni community, including the AKP. Erdoğan’s remarks were interpreted as confirmation of the rightness of that judgment. All of this also has serious implications for AKP’s plans for the Middle East. AKP has made great effort to depict Turkey as a model for the Middle East that blends Islam, democracy, capitalism and cultural tolerance. However, within Turkish politics, whether it is in dealings with the Kurdish community or the Alevi community, AKP is further and further drifting away from that model, increasingly taking ownership of an exclusively Sunni-Turkish identity at the expense of others. What they do not realize is that the road to regional power does not lie in that direction. If Turkey’s claim to regional leadership is not its economic and democratic success but rather its Sunni religious identity, Turkey will find itself soon outmatched by others who can play that card better (i.e., Saudi Arabia, Muslim Brotherhood etc.). Further, a strong Sunni identification will undercut Turkey’s claims to genuinely care for the plight of oppressed groups as in Palestine or Somalia. The Alevi community in Turkey is already asking: Does the AKP care about the ongoing massacres in Syria because they care about human life and democracy, or do they care because it is Sunnis who are being killed, and Assad is an Alawi? Finally, this short-sighted, identity-based foreign policy is what Turkey had always pursued in the past, with dismal results. The only difference is that in the past the emphasis was on the Turkish part of the Sunni-Turkish identity, and AKP is just giving it their own spin. For all these reasons, the juxtaposition of AKP’s criticisms of Assad’s regime with Erdoğan’s delight about the dismissal of the Sivas case is a little jarring, to say the least. The AKP government is running out of time to shift the growing perception that in Turkey plus ça change, plus c'est la même chose. Ayşe Zarakol is an Assistant Professor of Politics at Washington & Lee University blogging for PONARS Eurasia on Turkey, Russia and Iran relations and their common neighborhood. Images: Sivas from: umag.org.tr; Homs from: latimes.com

Related Topics
  • Sivas Massacre
  • Syria
  • Turkey
  • Zarakol
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

The Kremlin’s Message to Europe: It Could Have Been Worse

  • March 21, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

How Does Russia Identify Itself?

  • March 28, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

  • Irina Busygina
  • February 8, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.