PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
Contacts
Address 1957 E St NW, Washington, DC 20052 adminponars@gwu.edu 202.994.5915
NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • COVID-19 in Eurasia: PONARS Eurasia Policy Perspectives

    View
  • Preparing for the Parliamentary Elections of 2021: Russian Politics and Society (Gel’man, Lankina, Semenov, Smyth, and more)

    View
  • Russians supported Putin’s moves in Crimea in 2014. Here’s what’s different in 2021

    View
  • Putin’s Rules of the Game: The Pitfalls of Russia’s New Constitution

    View
  • In the Caucasus, There Is a Peace Agreement but Not Peace

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • Music and Politics in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2021] April 12, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Gorbachev about the dynamic music scene in contemporary Russia, and how free Russian musicians are to make political statements.
  • How is the Russian Government Coping with Rising Food Prices? [Lipman Series 2021] March 15, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Anton Tabakh about rising food prices in Russia, and what they might mean for Russia's current and future stability.
  • The Communist Party of the Russian Federation: More Than Just Systemic Opposition? [Lipman Series 2021] March 5, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Felix Light and Nikolay Petrov about the contemporary Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including the divisions between its leadership and membership, its attitude toward Alexei Navalny, and why it might be more than just "systemic" opposition after all.
  • Internet Resources: Civic Communication and State Surveillance [Lipman Series 2021] February 16, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Andrei Soldatov and Tanya Lokot about the role of the internet in contemporary Russian politics, including both as a tool of the Russian opposition and as an instrument of the increasingly repressive Russian regime.
  • The Rise of Alexei Navalny's Political Stature and Mass Protest in Russia [Lipman Series 2021] February 1, 2021
    In the first PONARS Eurasia Podcast of 2021, Maria Lipman chats with Greg Yudin about the current protests taking place in Russia, and what Alexei Navalny's growing popular support means for the Putin regime.
  • Russian Social Policy in the COVID-19 Era [Lipman Series 2020] December 21, 2020
    In 2020’s final episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sarah Wilson Sokhey and Ella Paneyakh to discuss Russian social policy in the COVID-19 era, and public perception of Russia’s overall pandemic response.
  • Conscious Parenting Practices in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2020] December 10, 2020
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Julia Yuzbasheva and Maria Danilova to learn more about the proliferation of "conscious parenting" practices in contemporary Russian society.
  • The Transformation of Belarussian Society [Lipman Series 2020] November 11, 2020
    In this episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Masha Lipman chats with Grigory Ioffe about the long-term and short-term factors that led up to the current protests in Belarus, and the ongoing transformation of Belarussian society.
  • Russian Lawmakers Adjust National Legislation to the Revised Constitutional Framework [Lipman Series 2020] October 26, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about ongoing changes to Russia’s national legislation based on the recently revised constitutional framework, and what these changes portend for the 2021 Duma election.
  • Russia's Regional Elections [Lipman Series 2020] September 25, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Graeme Robertson and Konstantin Gaaze about Russia’s September 13 regional elections and whether or not the Kremlin should be worried about upcoming Duma elections.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

The Kremlin’s Message to Europe: It Could Have Been Worse

  • March 21, 2012
  • Andrey Makarychev

 

On March 19, the CDU/CSU fraction of the German Bundestag hosted a day-long discussion, “Russia After the Elections: Modernization or Stagnation?”. It became clear to me that Russia, in spite of the recent social and political changes (since December 2011) still lacks a clear message toward Europe. Equally unfortunate, Europe lacks a thoughtful strategy about how to deal with the Russian leadership, even on issues of common concern. At the conference, the Russian speakers delivered two different messages to the German public. The first one, articulated by former Finance Minister Alexei Kudrin and Sergey Borisov (head of “Opora Rossii” business association) sounds quite simple: despite everything, Russia keeps moving in the right direction. It was hard to avoid the impression that there was another implicit signal behind Kudrin’s words: as soon as I am back in the government, everything will be even better. Both speakers were explicitly apolitical, though Kudrin, in his speech, tried to tacitly vindicate Russia’s claims for hegemony in the post-Soviet countries, reminding us that Russia, in the mid-1990s, took full responsibility for the entire debt of the Soviet Union.

Regarding post-Soviet integration, Borisov claimed that new regulations within the Russia–Belarus–Kazakhstan Customs Union have seriously augmented, among other factors, Putin’s popularity among small and middle-size entrepreneurs. Alexander Murychev, the executive vice president of the Russian Union of Industrialists and Entrepreneurs, went even further. He argued that “German entrepreneurs feel good in Russia,” which “does much better than the crisis-ridden EU.” Therefore, it makes no sense for Germany to raise politically sensitive issues in relations with Moscow. Moreover, as Murychev said, “Germany is Putin’s favorite country in Europe.” This point was supported by Fyodor Lukyanov, the editor-in-chief of the “Russiain Global Affairs” journal who, quite unexpectedly and even counter-intuitively, claimed that “Putin is more interested in Europe than Medvedev.” Lukyanov’s reasoned: Russia cannot integrate with the West, and this is not Russia’s fault since all Western institutions are in crisis. Therefore, as one may guess, Moscow's only option is to pursue a more robust and self-asserting policy in the CIS region. In line with this logic, Lukyanov presumed that the military conflict in August 2008 played a positive role for Russia in terms of preventing Georgia and Ukraine from joining NATO. Quite pessimistically, he predicted that Russian–Georgian relations will remain stalled. This type of outlook ignores recent positive developments regarding compromise between Moscow and Tbilisi, such as negotiations on Russia’s WTO accession (mediated by the United States), Georgia’s relaxing of its visa policies, and Russia’s proposal to restore diplomatic relations. In Lukyanov’s view, the major threat to the Caucasus comes from outside, i.e., from the possibility of a military operation against Iran, which might have implications for Azerbaijan and Armenia. He was also quite explicit in pointing to the centrality of missile-defense issues, particularly in the context of the presidential election in the United States. Against this background, Lilia Shevtsova from the Moscow Carnegie Center offered a different, much less Kremlin-friendly outlook. She argued that modernization in Russia under the current regime is impossible, thus shedding doubt on the utility of the EU-Russia modernization partnership. Of course, not all Germans were pleased to hear that “the unreformed system is decomposing, and Titanic is bound to sink,” and that "they should have paid more attention to the dangers of leftist populism and nationalism," which holds currency in Russia’s protest movements. Undoubtedly, this perspective is a challenge not only for Russia, but for all its neighbors, including the EU. In a final Voltaire-ist thought: if Lukashenko did not exist, it would be necessary to invent him. Both Russia and the EU badly need Belarus as a reference point in their discourses: for the Germans, it reveals the negative connotations of Putin’s rule; for the Kremlin, it illustrates that "things" could have been much worse. Perhaps, this is one of the pivotal points inscribed in the Russian message sent to Europe.

Andrey Makarychev is a Guest Professor at the Free University of Berlin, blogging for PONARS Eurasia on the Russia-EU neighborhood.

Andrey Makarychev
Andrey Makarychev
Website | + posts
Visiting Professor

Affiliation

Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, University of Tartu, Estonia

Links

University of Tartu (Bio)

Expertise

Russian Foreign and Security Policies, EU-Russian Relations, Foreign Policy Discourses, Regionalism and Federalism
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    The Minsk–Khabarovsk nexus: Ethical, performative, corporeal
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    Twigg: I worry about whether or not people are going to be willing to take Sputnik V in Russia
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    Culture as an Instrument
  • Andrey Makarychev
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/andrey-makarychev/
    The Coronavirus and the Future of Liberalism
Related Topics
  • Belarus
  • Europe
  • Kudrin
  • Lukashenko
  • Makarychev
  • Russia
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Russia has not sent troops to Syria

  • March 20, 2012
  • Dmitry Gorenburg
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

The Sivas Case and Turkey’s Credibility Problem Regarding Syria

  • March 23, 2012
  • Ayse Zarakol
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 22, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Авторитарные режимы не вечны: О ситуации в Белоруссии

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 14, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

В Беларуси пока что все идет по российскому сценарию

  • Olexiy Haran
  • August 12, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Опасная игра Лукашенко

  • Pavel Baev
  • August 11, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть справилась

  • Sergei Medvedev
  • August 10, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Непереломный момент: Смена Конституции

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 6, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Кейс Фургала и три мифа режима

  • Kirill Rogov
  • August 5, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.