PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Task Forces
    • Ukraine
    • Amplifying Voices of Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia (AVECCA)
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Task Forces
    • Ukraine
    • Amplifying Voices of Europe, the Caucasus, and Central Asia (AVECCA)
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • Clearing the Air: Secretary Blinken Visits Ukraine

    View
  • Ukraine Task Force: Getting Ukraine Right: From Negotiations Trap to Victory

    View
  • Ensuring Genuine Results? A New Electoral Design in Uzbekistan

    View
  • Ukraine, Taiwan, and Macron’s “Strategic Autonomy”

    View
  • After Violence: Russia’s Beslan School Massacre and the Peace that Followed

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Will Ukraine’s Fractured Electorate Create Another Power Turnover?

  • April 8, 2019
  • Sergiy Kudelia

(PONARS Eurasia) The first round of the presidential election in Ukraine on March 31 produced two frontrunners who will face each other in the run-off on April 21: challenger Volodymyr Zelensky (30.24 percent) and incumbent Petro Poroshenko (15.95 percent). Only once, in 1994, did a candidate who lost in the first round of Ukraine’s presidential election go on to win the presidency. Then, however, the gap between the results of the first-placed and second-placed candidates was 7.2 percent, or half of what it is in the current election.

This is only one of several reasons why Ukraine may soon experience a fourth power turnover through an election in its democratic history.

While having a preponderance of financial and administrative resources and dominating television coverage, Poroshenko prevailed only in two oblasts of Western Ukraine (Lvivska and Ternopilska). His ideological platform stressing traditionalist values and ethnocentric policies resonated with a more conservative electorate, but could not gain a cross-regional appeal. Even in Halychyna, however, he gained, on average, merely a quarter of the total number of votes cast (26.6 percent).

Poroshenko’s support exceeded 40 percent only in four electoral districts in the city of Lviv (see Figure 1). By contrast, Zelensky gained over 40 percent of the votes in three major Ukrainian provinces (Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa and Mykolaiv). He also benefitted from a substantial increase in turnout of younger voters, who constitute the most substantial of his electoral base. Every second voter in 18 to 29 age group according to Rating Group exit polls cast their ballots—an increase of 14 percent compared to 2014 election. 

The incumbency became a major disadvantage for Poroshenko, just as it was for Viktor Yushchenko in the 2010 election, because of the record low level of trust in the authorities (9 percent) and record high number of people (over 2/3) disapproving of the general direction of the country after 2014 Euromaidan revolution. These conditions naturally privilege the opposition and lower entry costs for multiple challengers irrespective of their possible subpar quality or lack of prior experience. Higher than average turnout rates in some Eastern and Southern Ukrainian provinces also point to a greater mobilization of opposition voters in this election.

As Figure 1 shows, an increase in support for the political newcomer Zelensky was associated with the lower level of backing for the incumbent across 199 electoral districts. This suggests that his political newcomer status and an anti-establishment campaign became particularly attractive for those who sought to impose “electoral punishment” on the authorities. While winning in 19 out of 24 oblasts of Ukraine, Zelensky received the smallest share of votes of any frontrunner in Ukraine’s two-round presidential elections (see Figure 2). By contrast, the next seven candidates following Zelensky and Poroshenko received almost half of all votes in the election (49.27 percent).

This points to a highly fractured electorate desiring change, but lacking a clear consensus on the incumbent’s replacement. The fracturing of voters creates a potential for several coalition-building scenarios. However, Poroshenko’s clear ideological positioning before the first round and incumbency status narrows his possible path to victory in the remaining weeks.

Zelensky defeated Poroshenko in Eastern and Southern Ukraine by far greater margins than elsewhere indicating Poroshenko’s faint prospects of winning in any of these regions. Hence, the president’s only viable electoral strategy is in reassembling the “orange” coalition of 2004 centered on Central and Western Ukraine, which could give him a winning edge with a higher turnout in these areas.

His plan may be to politicize the geopolitical cleavage portraying his opponent as a pro-Russian stooge, which he already signaled in his appeal to hold public debates. This would be particularly difficult with regard to Zelensky who attracts a broad cross-section of younger voters (under 45) irrespective of their native language or region of residence. He received twice as many votes as Poroshenko in Chernivtsi oblast and three times as many in Zakarpattia – both in Western Ukraine. His advisors include several former government officials and members of parliament with strong pro-European credentials.

Poroshenko may also try to amplify his national security experience and risks associated with the power transfer to a neophyte politician. However, recent corruption allegations against his close circle related to defense procurement weaken Poroshenko’s credibility both as a reformer and as a commander-in-chief.

Poroshenko’s difficulty in catching up with Zelensky is also evident from his poor showing in many districts both in the East and the West of the country. Although he received the second place nationwide, he finished third or lower in 67 percent of electoral districts (see Figure 3).

This again points to a strong anti-incumbent preference among voters in this election. Other presidential candidates, like Yulia Tymoshenko, Yuriy Boiko, Anatoliy Hrytsenko and Ihor Smeshko, could play an important role in influencing voter choices in the second round. All of them already stated that they would refrain from aligning with any of the two candidates, but they dismissed the possibility of voting for Poroshenko.

This “negative” endorsement may essentially seal Poroshenko’s re-election prospects. It may produce a drop in turn-out in the regions crucial for his re-election and spontaneous coordination of more intensely opposition-minded voters around a new challenger.

 

Related Topics
  • Elections
  • Kudelia
  • Ukraine
Previous Article
  • Uncategorized

Surviving Modernization: The Revolutionary Origins of Soviet Durability

  • April 8, 2019
  • Lucan Way
View
Next Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Wishnick: The North Korean nuclear crisis has prompted unprecedented collaboration between Russia and China

  • April 8, 2019
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Clearing the Air: Secretary Blinken Visits Ukraine

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • September 19, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine Task Force: Getting Ukraine Right: From Negotiations Trap to Victory

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • May 25, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ensuring Genuine Results? A New Electoral Design in Uzbekistan

  • Akrom Avezov
  • May 19, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine, Taiwan, and Macron’s “Strategic Autonomy”

  • Maurizio Delli Santi
  • April 30, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

After Violence: Russia’s Beslan School Massacre and the Peace that Followed

  • Debra Javeline
  • April 24, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Unnamed War: Before the Russian Invasion of 2022

  • Dominique Arel and Jesse Driscoll
  • April 15, 2023
View
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

A Rock and a Hard Place: The Russian Opposition in a Time of War | New Voices on Eurasia with Jeremy Ladd (April 11)

  • PONARS Eurasia
  • April 9, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russia’s Regional Governors: Backing the War, Upholding the Status Quo

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • April 7, 2023

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.