PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Russia Program at GW (IERES)

    View
  • The Evolving Concerns of Russians after the Invasion | New Voices on Eurasia with Sasha de Vogel (March 9)

    View
  • PONARS Eurasia Spring Policy Conference (March 3)

    View
  • Ukrainathon 2023 (Feb. 24-25)

    View
  • How Putin has shrugged off unprecedented economic sanctions over Russia’s war in Ukraine – for now

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

After Crimea: Putin’s Balance Sheet

  • April 7, 2014
  • Nicu Popescu

When it comes to foreign policy, Russia is good at sprinting, while the West – and especially the EU – is better at marathons. The use of kinetic military force by Moscow is to a large extent a sign that other, long-term foreign policy means failed in Ukraine: Russian coercive diplomacy – based on sticks (embargoes and sanctions) and carrots (offers of cheaper gas and greater market access) – did not have the desired effect.

Moscow believes it can achieve its goals with rapid bursts of sprinting, and that the West will not quicken its pace in response. In Crimea, the territory was captured in a manner that was both quick and bloodless, with the weak state institutions of Ukraine simply crumbling in the face of Russian aggression. The problem is that other post-Soviet states are equally weak (or even weaker) and although they have successfully withstood periodic Russian embargoes over the last two decades, they are unlikely to be able to resist any form of military action. Worryingly, the option of sending armed, masked men to take over public buildings in a third state is very much on the table – particularly because this has proved not only easy, but also effective – and is therefore dangerously appealing.

The domestic benefits

So far, the military intervention in Ukraine has paid off handsomely for Putin – at least domestically. Most Russians strongly endorse the annexation of Crimea: according to the independent Levada Centre, 88% of Russians support the annexation (and only 7% oppose it). As a result, Putin’s ratings have again rocketed. The seizing of Crimea also had the effect of uniting more people behind the president and splitting the opposition. Beyond his usual support base (50-60% of the populace), Putin has managed to also rally those on the far right and left of Russia’s political spectrum – nationalists as well as communists and those who lament the collapse of the Soviet Union. During the Bolotnaya Square protests in the winter of 2011-2012, a key driver of the movement was the emergence of a broad alliance of people united against Putin. Now the majority of nationalists and communists are behind him, while the liberal minority are branded by Putin himself a ‘fifth column’ or ‘national traitors’ – terms widely employed during the 1930s.

The fog of the crisis also allowed Russia to crack down on what is left of the independent media. TV Rain was hit hard after several cable operators shut the station out of their network, leading to a collapse in viewing numbers and advertising revenues. The most visible opposition leader, Alexei Navalny, was put under house arrest, and his blog was banned. Several independent websites (ej.ru, grani.ru and kasparov.ru) were also put on a black list of internet providers – at the request of the general prosecutor – because of their ‘calls for unlawful activity and participation in mass protests’. Lenta.ru, the most popular news website in Russia, had its liberal director forced out. Kommersant also had its director replaced, and its Ukrainian outfit was shut down after journalists insisted on some degree of editorial independence when covering developments in Ukraine. But with the Ukraine crisis dominating the international and domestic airwaves, these events passed largely unnoticed.

The international costs

Economically, the Crimea military venture has obviously incurred significant costs. Russia will need to spend billions annually to subsidise Crimea. Until recently, around two-thirds of the Crimean budget was subsidised by the central government in Kiev: this financial burden will now fall on Moscow. Russia will also have to raise salaries and pensions, as well as invest heavily in infrastructure, not least by constructing a bridge to span the Kerch Strait.

Tourism in Crimea (which was generating income in the informal economy, but little tax revenue) is likely to collapse since 70% of tourists visiting the region were from the rest of Ukraine. On the other hand, some of these costs will be offset by the capture of a third of Ukraine’s gas reserves (located in Crimea’s territorial waters) and the withdrawal of the gas discounts currently offered to Ukraine. Part of the package offered to Kiev in exchange for the stationing of the Russian Black Sea fleet in Sevastopol, Russia estimates these discounts to be worth approximately €2 billion per year.

Western sanctions (and the threat of more) have already led to over €50 billion worth of capital flight from Russia in less than three months, which is more than the total amount of net capital flight in 2013. Moreover, as less money flows in, portfolio investors are withdrawing their capital. Most Russian companies will also be affected: taking credits, refinancing debt, placing bonds, and entering into partnerships with Western firms are all set to become more expensive.

These negative effects will hit an economy which was already shaky to begin with. In 2013, the Russian economy was effectively stagnant (with growth reaching only 1.2%), and the outlook for 2014 appears even worse. A sign of future troubles, the rouble also depreciated significantly in the beginning of this year, even before the annexation of Crimea.

Yet, Putin is not thinking like an accountant, but like a politician. For the Russian president, the economy is subordinated to the wider political calculation of staying in power. In this regard, projecting the image of a greater Russia (domestically and regionally) is well worth losing a few billion euros. Moreover, Russian economic woes – which have their roots in incompetence, corruption, and the lack of reform – can now be blamed on the West, potentially leading to an even greater ‘rally-behind-the-flag’ effect. So while Putin does not stand to gain anything in economic terms, the current diplomatic conflict does provide him with a plausible alibi for the impending economic difficulties.

In terms of foreign policy costs, Russia finds itself ‘suspended’ from the G8, and talks on visa-free travel with the EU have been put on hold. It will also be much more difficult to pursue the usual pipeline diplomacy in the EU – South Stream has now even more question marks hanging over it. In security terms, NATO and the US will become more active in central Europe. Finally, Ukraine and other postSoviet states, even friendly ones, are likely to start hedging more against Russia, though as tacitly as possible.

The future estimates

Yet none of these costs are significant enough to outweigh the benefits reaped from the current crisis, and the Kremlin remains convinced Russia can weather the political storm. Domestically, Putin is emboldened: he can live with the international diplomatic costs for now, and in any case, believes that most diplomatic sanctions will come to an end sooner rather than later. His billionaire friends might make less money, but will remain billionaires nonetheless.

Russia takes comfort in the different nuances of Western reactions to its behaviour, and from the fact that most of the world – including Russia’s BRICS partners – is taking a broadly neutral stance on the changing of borders through military means. And even if other post-Soviet states now trust Russia less and less, they also fear Russia more, and are therefore likely to be more accommodating of Russian projects such as the Eurasian Union. Even the idea that Ukraine is now ‘lost’ to Russia is questionable. In the past, Russia has intervened militarily in Georgia and Moldova, yet neither of these countries have developed a strong anti-Russian societal consensus – nor is one likely to materialise in Ukraine.

Putin’s cost-benefit analysis poses a real danger for European security. Further interventions in Georgia, Moldova, Azerbaijan or, say, a post-Nazarbayev Kazakhstan do not seem as far-fetched as they did a few weeks ago. The West need not necessarily begin sprinting, but the pace of the marathon may have to pick up.

 

See the article at euobserver | click here for the PDF © EU Institute for Security Studies

 

Related Topics
  • Crimea
  • Popescu
  • Russia
  • Ukraine
Previous Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

U.S.-Russia Health Engagement: Still on the Agenda

  • April 4, 2014
  • Judyth Twigg
View
Next Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Multilateral Institutions in a New Geopolitical Era (Video)

  • April 7, 2014
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

  • Irina Busygina
  • February 8, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.