PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
Contacts

Address
1957 E St NW,
Washington, DC 20052

adminponars@gwu.edu
202.994.5915

NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • Membership
      • All Members
      • Core Members
      • Collegium Members
      • Associate Members
      • About Membership
    • Ukraine Experts
    • Executive Committee
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
    • Submissions
  • Podcasts
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
  • Ukraine Experts
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • The Russia Program at GW (IERES)

    View
  • The Evolving Concerns of Russians after the Invasion | New Voices on Eurasia with Sasha de Vogel (March 9)

    View
  • PONARS Eurasia Spring Policy Conference (March 3)

    View
  • Ukrainathon 2023 (Feb. 24-25)

    View
  • How Putin has shrugged off unprecedented economic sanctions over Russia’s war in Ukraine – for now

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • The Putin-Xi Summit: What's New In Their Joint Communique ? February 23, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman speaks with Russian China experts Vita Spivak and Alexander Gabuev about the February meeting between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, and what it may tell us about where the Russian-Chinese relationship is headed.
  • Exploring the Russian Courts' Ruling to Liquidate the Memorial Society January 28, 2022
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with scholars Kelly Smith and Benjamin Nathans about the history, achievements, and impending shutdown of the Memorial Society, Russia's oldest and most venerable civic organization, and what its imminent liquidation portends for the Russian civil society.
  • Russia's 2021 census and the Kremlin's nationalities policy [Lipman Series 2021] December 9, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with social scientist Andrey Shcherbak about the quality of the data collected in the recent population census and the goals of Vladimir Putin's government's nationalities policy
  • Active citizens of any kind are under threat [Lipman Series 2021] November 5, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Alexander Verkhovsky about the Kremlin's ever expanding toolkit against political and civic activists, journalists, and other dissidents.
  • Russia's Legislative Elections followup [Lipman Series 2021] October 4, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Tanya Lokot and Nikolay Petrov about the results of Russia’s legislative elections and about what comes next.
  • Why Is the Kremlin Nervous? [Lipman Series 2021] September 14, 2021
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about Russia’s September 17-19 legislative elections, repressive measures against electoral challengers, and whether to expect anything other than preordained results.
  • Vaccine Hesitancy in Russia, France, and the United States [Lipman Series 2021] August 31, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Denis Volkov, Naira Davlashyan, and Peter Slevin about why COVID-19 vaccination rates are still so low across the globe, comparing vaccine hesitant constituencies across Russia, France, and the United States.  
  • Is Russia Becoming More Soviet? [Lipman Series 2021] July 26, 2021
      In a new PONARS Eurasia Podcast episode, Maria Lipman chats with Maxim Trudolyubov about the current tightening of the Russian political sphere, asking whether or not it’s helpful to draw comparisons to the late Soviet period.
  • The Evolution of Russia's Political Regime [Lipman Series 2021] June 21, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Grigory Golosov and Henry Hale about the evolution of Russia's political regime, and what to expect in the lead-up to September's Duma elections.
  • Volodymyr Zelensky: Year Two [Lipman Series 2021] May 24, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sergiy Kudelia and Georgiy Kasianov about Ukrainian President Zelensky's second year in office, and how he has handled the political turbulence of the past year.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Eastern Promises: Who Pays?

  • December 20, 2013
  • Andrey Makarychev

The "Eastern Promises" seminar at the Lithuanian Embassy in Brussels a few days ago started like a detective story: the Ukrainian security services detained at the airport Vasil Filipchuk, senior advisor at the International Center for Policy Studies in Kyiv, in order to prevent him from participating. How curious. Is there a terrible truth about the Yanukovych regime that they're hiding from the EU?

In Brussels, the irritation about the Eurasian Union is enormous. "Putin's project is an elephant in the room,” one of the participants said. But, apart from all the emotions, there is a clear policy rationale in the anti-Putin discourse in Europe: the Kremlin-promoted idea of spheres of influence for many is incompatible with democracy, since it leads to the dependence of rulers like Yanukovych on "the elephant" rather than on his own people.

Yet the debate is of course not only about norms, but also about pragmatic outcomes, As Svante Cornell, director of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute at John Hopkins University presumed, there are only two scenarios to solve the frozen conflicts provoked by separatism. One option would be to surrender to Russian demands and integrate with Russian institutions (Moldova with Transnistria, Georgia with Abkhazia and South Ossetia). Another scenario would be to keep institutionally attaching Moldova and Georgia to the European normative order, and incite the breakaway territories to look in the same direction. This is what is happening in the Western Balkans where both Serbia and Kosovo might ultimately have a chance to find their places in an enlarged EU.

This is exactly what Martin Sieg, foreign policy advisor to the CDU/CSU in the Germany Bundestag, considers as the most effective way out for the conflict in Transnistria. Seventy-percent of all exports of this territory go to Moldova and the EU, yet under the present conditions Tiraspol can't partake of the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA). The EU wants Moldova to take care of economic transformation in Transnistria, which either accepts this offer and thus turn to the EU, or would face a need to keep asking for economic sponsorship from Moscow.

This raised an important question: who pays (and will pay) for the ambitions of breakaway territories to go independent, in human lives and in financial resources? Political strategies of separatist units from the very beginning were based on the idea of their victimization, but we also need to know how economically viable they are. Are they able, for example, to pay for their gas consumption? If they choose to rely mostly on external support, the key question is whether this reliance might be detrimental for this external country in terms of its relations with more important international actors.

These questions also relate to Nagorno-Karabakh. From the Armenian perspective, buffer zones in Nagorno-Karabakh are only consequences of the conflict, and it does not make sense to address them. Yet does this mean that everything that is going on in the territory can be justified as effects of a bygone war? Some in Armenia want to come back to discussing the status of Nagorno-Karabakh within Azerbaijan during the Soviet times, but that would be an equivalent of revising the belongingness of Crimea to Ukraine—an argument used by many Russian nationalists.

Informal conversation with Armenian diplomats gave a blurred picture: they failed to clearly identify Russian interests in supporting this country militarily and economically, preferring simply to take it for granted that there should be some interests since Russian troops are there. On the question of the price for independence, they claimed that since many locals died in Karabakh two and a half decades ago, Armenians have already paid their price. Whether Russia has to pay its own, remains unanswered.

As the case of Ukraine shows, Moscow is ready to disburse money for economically questionable, yet politically salient purposes. The EU is not, which adds one more point to the list of drastic differences between Moscow and Brussels. Yet this also makes clear how the effects of Color Revolutions differ from the demise of socialist regimes in Eastern Europe in 1989/1991: what used to be an absolutely normative agenda two-and-a-half decades ago turned into a rather material issue for all parties involved.

Related Topics
  • Brussels
  • EU
  • Makarychev
  • Moldova
  • Russia
  • Transnistria
  • Ukraine
Previous Article
  • In the News | Hовости

Ukraine, Russia, and Strengthening Russia’s Black Sea Fleet

  • December 19, 2013
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
Next Article
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

New Policy Memo: Why Russia Undermines the Norm of Nuclear Disarmament

  • December 20, 2013
  • Polina Sinovets
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

The Desire to Possess: Russia’s War for Territory

  • Irina Busygina
  • February 8, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Kyiv-Washington Relations in Times of Colossal War: The Ultimate Test of a Strategic Partnership

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • January 11, 2023
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Prevailing Soviet Legacies

  • Irina Busygina and Mikhail Filippov
  • December 27, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

In Russia’s Nuclear Messaging to West and Ukraine, Putin Plays Both Bad and Good Cop

  • Simon Saradzhyan
  • December 23, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Ukraine’s Asymmetric Responses to the Russian Invasion

  • Nurlan Aliyev
  • July 28, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем
  • Territorial Conflict

Dominating Ukraine’s Sky

  • Volodymyr Dubovyk
  • March 5, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии
  • Recommended | Рекомендуем

Russian Anti-War Protests and the State’s Response

  • Lauren McCarthy
  • March 4, 2022
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events
Powered by narva.io

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.