PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
Contacts
Address 1957 E St NW, Washington, DC 20052 adminponars@gwu.edu 202.994.5915
NEWSLETTER
Facebook
Twitter
YouTube
Podcast
PONARS Eurasia
PONARS Eurasia
  • About
    • Contact
    • List of Members
  • Policy Memos
    • List of Policy Memos
  • Podcast
  • Online Academy
  • Events
    • Past Events
  • Recommended
DIGITAL RESOURCES
digital resources

Bookstore 📚

Knowledge Hub

Course Syllabi

Point & Counterpoint

Policy Perspectives

RECOMMENDED
  • In the Caucasus, There Is a Peace Agreement but Not Peace

    View
  • Russia’s Niche Soft Power: Sources, Targets and Channels of Influence

    View
  • A Weak Link in NATO? Bulgaria, Russia, and the Lure of Espionage

    View
  • Russia’s Weak Strongman: The Perilous Bargains That Keep Putin in Power

    View
  • Special Issue: Russia’s 2020 Constitutional Reform: The Politics of Institutionalizing the Status-Quo

    View
RSS PONARS Eurasia Podcast
  • How is the Russian Government Coping with Rising Food Prices? [Lipman Series 2021] March 15, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Anton Tabakh about rising food prices in Russia, and what they might mean for Russia's current and future stability.
  • The Communist Party of the Russian Federation: More Than Just Systemic Opposition? [Lipman Series 2021] March 5, 2021
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Felix Light and Nikolay Petrov about the contemporary Communist Party of the Russian Federation, including the divisions between its leadership and membership, its attitude toward Alexei Navalny, and why it might be more than just "systemic" opposition after all.
  • Internet Resources: Civic Communication and State Surveillance [Lipman Series 2021] February 16, 2021
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Andrei Soldatov and Tanya Lokot about the role of the internet in contemporary Russian politics, including both as a tool of the Russian opposition and as an instrument of the increasingly repressive Russian regime.
  • The Rise of Alexei Navalny's Political Stature and Mass Protest in Russia [Lipman Series 2021] February 1, 2021
    In the first PONARS Eurasia Podcast of 2021, Maria Lipman chats with Greg Yudin about the current protests taking place in Russia, and what Alexei Navalny's growing popular support means for the Putin regime.
  • Russian Social Policy in the COVID-19 Era [Lipman Series 2020] December 21, 2020
    In 2020’s final episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Sarah Wilson Sokhey and Ella Paneyakh to discuss Russian social policy in the COVID-19 era, and public perception of Russia’s overall pandemic response.
  • Conscious Parenting Practices in Contemporary Russia [Lipman Series 2020] December 10, 2020
    In this week's episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Julia Yuzbasheva and Maria Danilova to learn more about the proliferation of "conscious parenting" practices in contemporary Russian society.
  • The Transformation of Belarussian Society [Lipman Series 2020] November 11, 2020
    In this episode of the PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Masha Lipman chats with Grigory Ioffe about the long-term and short-term factors that led up to the current protests in Belarus, and the ongoing transformation of Belarussian society.
  • Russian Lawmakers Adjust National Legislation to the Revised Constitutional Framework [Lipman Series 2020] October 26, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Ben Noble and Nikolay Petrov about ongoing changes to Russia’s national legislation based on the recently revised constitutional framework, and what these changes portend for the 2021 Duma election.
  • Russia's Regional Elections [Lipman Series 2020] September 25, 2020
    In this week’s PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Graeme Robertson and Konstantin Gaaze about Russia’s September 13 regional elections and whether or not the Kremlin should be worried about upcoming Duma elections.
  • Understanding the Protests in Belarus [Lipman Series 2020] September 11, 2020
    In this week's PONARS Eurasia Podcast, Maria Lipman chats with Natalya Chernyshova (University of Winchester) and Nikolay Petrov (Chatham House) about the ongoing protests in Belarus, and what they mean for the future of the current regime.
  • Commentary | Комментарии

The Fruits and Frustrations of Democracy: Moldova’s Divided Parliament

  • December 2, 2010
  • Henry Hale
 

Brief perspectives from Henry E. Hale and Ludmila Coada:

 

Moldova’s November 2010 parliamentary election once again seems to have produced a hung parliament. While the Alliance for European Integration (AEI) will be able to elect a prime minister and speaker of parliament with its simple majority, it won’t have the 61 votes needed to select a president of its choosing without some help from the Communist Party, which for over a year has refused to provide it (Algeri).

 

While most of the attention is on this presidential deadlock, there is a sense in which Moldova’s proverbial glass is also half full. For one thing, the election was reasonably free and fair by most reliable counts, a rarity in the post-Soviet space outside the Baltics (e-democracy). And when society is divided, as Moldova’s is, a democratic parliamentary system will produce a divided parliament, which Moldova has once again. The system, in this sense, is working. Blaming the constitution seems a little like blaming the messenger.

 

We should remember the reason that 61-vote requirement for electing a president was put in place instead of requiring a simple majority: To prevent any one side from imposing its will on the rest without having overwhelming support. The fact that no side has this overwhelming support, and that none has been able to achieve it despite a year of genuine political opening and fierce competition for hearts and minds, indicates that what Moldova very much needs is for its feuding politicians to compromise. This is what its constitution is forcing them to do, resist as they might. Democracy’s constraining function is as important as its enabling ones, and democracy is healthiest when politicians come to grips with this fact and learn to work within their constraints, even when this requires reaching across the aisle.

 

There is actually a great deal of fundamental agreement by the winning parties despite their bitter rivalries. Perhaps most importantly, all—even the Communists—support working to join the European Union. Moldova is small and “digestible” enough that it might just have a shot. Why not set aside the most divisive issues for a while and work toward this? Surely a little encouragement from the US and the European Union itself could help.

 

–Henry E. Hale, Director, Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University

________________________________

The parliamentary elections on November 28 were important for Moldova because voters had to choose between the future and the past—between a Western/EU approach or a plunge back into the Eurasian system through a stronger relationship with Russia. Moldova’s citizens mobilized, understanding the importance of the elections, with the OSCE calling the elections fair ("These elections reflected the will of the people.”). Unfortunately, the election results were not promising and do not guarantee political stability for the Republic of Moldova. The results were similar with the outcome of the 2009 July elections, when no political party was able attract the sufficient number of parliamentary votes required to elect a president. The 2010 elections proved that Moldovan society is still dispersed between old and young generations. The old generation is nostalgic for past times and remains loyal to the communist party, which seems to be their only lever to regain the stability of old Soviet times. The young generation precepts an Occident future and opts for an European country. With the new parliament, it is difficult to predict how things will develop but it is obvious that the first major step is the creation of one coalition. The leaders must be rational. Maintaining the Alliance for European Integration would be the best variant for Moldova because democratic reforms and a pro-Western orientation would continue. The Alliance can be currently formed by PLDM (Liberal Democratic Party), PD (Democratic Party), and the PL (Liberal Party) to counteract, once again, the Communist Party, which won the snap election in 2009 and also won the most seats in this election. Such a scenario would be well greeted by Western institutions. However, the current coalition does not have sufficient votes to elect the president, which is why the short-term task of the leaders of the Alliance is to find votes among the communist deputies, which will prove difficult. Any other coalition within the framework of the new parliament is difficult to imagine. A coalition of the Communists with the PLDM  is an impossibility because of a contradiction in values; a coalition of the Communists with the PD is unrealistic because they would not agree on a president. Time will tell if the country’s politicians have grown up after 20 years. They need to deliver a president and other important executive and legislative solutions on behalf of the citizens who voted them into the civil service. –Ludmila Coada, Visiting Fulbright Scholar, Institute for European, Russian, and Eurasian Studies, The George Washington University

________________________________

Facts and figures: Elections were held on November 28, 2010. Electoral candidates: 39 (20 political parties and 19 independent candidates). Voter turnout: 59.10% (of the country's 2.6 million eligible voters). Election results: Four political parties enter the new parliament: the Communist Party won the largest number of seats: 42; the Liberal Democratic Party: 32 seats; the Democratic Party: 15 seats, and the Liberal Party: 12 seats.

Secondary Author:
Ludmila Coada
Henry Hale
Website | + posts
Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, Elliott School of International Affairs; Co-director, Institute for European, Russian and Eurasian Studies (IERES); Co-director, PONARS Eurasia

Affiliation

The George Washington University

Links

The George Washington University

Expertise

Political Regimes, Ethnic Politics, Federalism, Democratization, Political Parties, Politics of Post-Soviet Countries
  • Henry Hale
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/henry-hale/
    Don’t Call It a Cold War: Findings From the Russian-American Relations Survey
  • Henry Hale
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/henry-hale/
    Russia’s referendum could keep Vladimir Putin in power until 2036. What do high-ranking Russians think?
  • Henry Hale
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/henry-hale/
    Will the Protesters Return? Civil Disobedience in the Time of Covid-19
  • Henry Hale
    https://www.ponarseurasia.org/members/henry-hale/
    Ukraine’s citizens worry about covid-19. And they still have to worry about the war.
Related Topics
  • Coada
  • Hale
  • Moldova
  • Parliament
Previous Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

How to Get a Second Term in 2012: Russian Edition

  • November 24, 2010
  • Joshua Tucker
View
Next Article
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Quick Comment — Unrest in Russia

  • December 15, 2010
  • PONARS Eurasia
View
You May Also Like
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Путин и Лукашенко

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 29, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Отравление оппозиционеров в России превратилось в регулярную практику

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 22, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Авторитарные режимы не вечны: О ситуации в Белоруссии

  • Vladimir Gelman
  • August 14, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

В Беларуси пока что все идет по российскому сценарию

  • Olexiy Haran
  • August 12, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Опасная игра Лукашенко

  • Pavel Baev
  • August 11, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Власть справилась

  • Sergei Medvedev
  • August 10, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Непереломный момент: Смена Конституции

  • Konstantin Sonin
  • August 6, 2020
View
  • Commentary | Комментарии

Кейс Фургала и три мифа режима

  • Kirill Rogov
  • August 5, 2020

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

PONARS Eurasia
  • About
  • Membership
  • Policy Memos
  • Recommended
  • Events

Permissions & Citation Guidelines

Input your search keywords and press Enter.